Answer:
See explanation below
Explanation:
This mechanism of polimerization is of one type. This mechanism goes through free radical polimerization, which means that we use a initiator as the radical source, then, the polimerization begins with the breaking of the covalent bonds of that initiator. In this case the benzoyl peroxide. And this mechanism is given in three steps.
In the picture you have the mechanism in the 3 steps:
Answer:
two
Explanation:
The number of significant figures needed in the answer is 2.
This is because when finding the products of two numbers, the result is as accurate as the least number of significant figures of the numbers being multiplied.
Here the numbers being multiplied are;
1.31m
6.5m
1.31m has 3 significant figures
6.5m has 2 significant figures.
So, the product will have 2 significant figures
<span>Celsius scale: 100 degrees.
Fahrenheit scale: 180 degrees.</span>
Answer:
1) The value of Kc:
C. remains the same.
2) The value of Qc:
A. is greater than Kc.
3) The reaction must:
B. run in the reverse direction to restablish equilibrium.
4) The concentration of N2 will:
B. decrease.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, by means of the Le Chatelier's principle which is based on the shift a chemical reaction could have under some modifications, we have:
1) The value of Kc:
C. remains the same, since it just depend the reaction's thermodynamics as it is computed via:
2) The value of Qc:
A. is greater than Kc, since the reaction quotient is:
![Qc=\frac{[N_2][H_2]^3}{[NH_3]^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Qc%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BN_2%5D%5BH_2%5D%5E3%7D%7B%5BNH_3%5D%5E2%7D)
Thus, the lower the concentration of ammonia, the higher Qc, making Qc>Kc.
3) The reaction must:
B. run in the reverse direction to restablish equilibrium, since ammonia was withdrawn and should be regenerated to reach the equilibrium.
4) The concentration of N2 will:
B. decrease, since less reactant is forming the products.
Best regards.
Answer:
not valid
Explanation:
Expert judgment is a useful validation method to verify the reliability of an investigation that is defined as “an informed opinion of people with experience in the subject, who are recognized by others as qualified experts in it, and who can give information, evidence, judgments and assessments ”
After submitting an instrument for comparison to the consultation and expert opinion, it must meet two quality criteria: validity and reliability. The validity of content is often established based on two situations, one that concerns the design of a test and the other, the validation of an instrument subject to translation and standardization procedures to adapt it to different cultural meanings. It is here that the task of the expert becomes a fundamental task to eliminate irrelevant aspects, incorporate those that are essential and / or modify those that require it.
