Last month, we featured IRB best practices (“IRBs: Navigating the Maze” November 2007 Observer), and got the ball rolling with strategies and tips that psychological scientists have found to work. Here, we continue the dissemination effort with the second of three articles by researchers who share their experiences with getting their research through IRB hoops. Jerry Burger from Santa Clara University managed to do the seemingly impossible — he conducted a partial replication of the infamous Milgram experiment. Read on for valuable advice, and look for similar coverage in upcoming Observers. These are the first words I said to Muriel Pearson, producer for ABC News’ Primetime, when she approached me with the idea of replicating Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience studies. Milgram’s work was conducted in the early 1960s before the current system of professional guidelines and IRBs was in place. It is often held up as the prototypic example of why we need policies to protect the welfare of research participants. Milgram’s participants were placed in an emotionally excruciating situation in which an experimenter instructed them to continue administering electric shocks to another individual despite hearing that person’s agonizing screams of protest. The studies ignited a debate about the ethical treatment of participants. And the research became, as I often told my students, the study that can never be replicated. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The distance between the charges is 9.5 cm
(c) is correct option
Explanation:
Given that,
Charge 
Force F = 1 N
We need to calculate the distance between the charges
Using Coulomb's formula
Where, q = charge
r = distance
F = force
Put the value into the formula
Hence, The distance between the charges is 9.5 cm
Answer: 100 m
Explanation:
Initial speed(u) = 40 m/s
Final speed(v) = 0 m/s
Acceleration = v-u/t
=> 0-40/5
=> 8 m/s^2
Displacement= s
=> 2as = v^2-u^2
=> 2(-8)(s) = 0 - (40)^2
=> -16s = -1600
s = 100 m
We can say the vehicle move 100 meters before stopping.
