Answer:
Option C is false statement. The half life of a second order reaction is not dependent on concentration.
Explanation:
Half life of a reaction is defined as the amount of time which is required for a reactant concentration reduced by half comparison to its initial concentration.
Half life of a second order reaction is depend on the initial concentration of a reaction, in contrast to 1st order reaction.
I don't know the options but usually a small strainer or a coffee thing u put over a cup and let the water seep down and the sugar stays.
It's lone a little distinction (103 degrees versus 104 degrees in water), and I trust the standard rationalization is that since F is more electronegative than H, the electrons in the O-F bond invest more energy far from the O (and near the F) than the electrons in the O-H bond. That moves the powerful focal point of the unpleasant constrain between the bonding sets far from the O, and thus far from each other. So the shock between the bonding sets is marginally less, while the repugnance between the solitary matches on the O is the same - the outcome is the edge between the bonds is somewhat less.
There are 66 neutrons in a single atom of indium-115. The atomic number of indium-115 is 49, meaning there are 49 protons. Then the atomic mass is 115, so 115-49 = 66.
hydrogen and oxygen atoms
Explanation:
this is because they are non metals and there will be sharing of electrons between the two atoms forming the bond
