Control group: 50 dogs continuing their normal diet
Experiments group: 50 dogs chosen to eat the new food
Independent variable: dog food
Dependent variable: the dogs’ weight
Answer:
Field experiments can often have the potential to give scientists opportunities that are not possible in a lab setting.
Explanation:
Having people "act natural" in a lab setting is impossible to truly achieve, as we all know what happens to our mental state and behavior when we are being actively observed. This is also especially helpful when conducting wildlife research, as there are a myriad of different things influencing animal and plant behavior that would be nigh impossible to recreate perfectly in a controlled lab setting.
Field research can have its disadvantages as well, as it is very hard to only have one thing change (make an independent variable) in a wild environment with ever-changing weather, social effects, etc. Also, you, as the researcher, as causing an impact on the very location that you are observing, which can alter your results in unpredictable ways.
The thing to remember is that each type of study has its advantages and disadvantages; if they didn't, then we'd all do the same type of research! You have to weigh your research options and figure out which one works best for your situation :)
T<span>he Formula for sodium chlorate is- </span>NaClO3.
The Rutherford experiment proved the Thomson “plum-pudding” model of the atom to be essentially correct did not give the results described and is denoted as option A.
<h3>What is Thomson “plum-pudding” model?</h3>
This model was proposed by J.J Thomson in which referred an atom as a sphere of positive charge, and negatively charged electrons are embedded in it to balance the total positive charge.
This model was incorrect and the Rutherford atomic model was adopted in which he described the electrons orbits about a tiny positive nucleus.
The nucleus contains protons and neutrons instead thereby making it the correct choice.
Read more about Atom here brainly.com/question/6258301
#SPJ1
The options include the following:
a.The Rutherford experiment proved the Thomson “plum-pudding” model of the atom to be essentially correct.
b.The Rutherford experiment was useful in determining the nuclear charge on the atom.
c.Milikan’s oil-drop experiment showed that the charge on any particle was a simple multiple of the charge on the electron.
d.The electric discharge tube proved that electrons have a negative charge
