Why is it important for scientists to replicate each other's experiments

2 answers:

6 0

A. Scientific results presented by a scientist should be reproducible anywhere in the world, without this, the results can not be accepted as theory.

guapka [62]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

It is very much essential for the researchers to replicate the experiments of each other as this will assist in finding whether the essential scientific outcomes are repeatable or not. The scientific results demonstrated by a researcher should be reproducible anywhere in the globe as if it is not tan the outcomes cannot be regarded as a theory.

You might be interested in

I will brainly <br> And 5 star rate

Alex777 [14]

The answer is Agree :)

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which tool was most likely used in a procedure if the lab report shows that approximately 300 mL of water was used?

BARSIC [14]

Answer:

A beaker

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Thermal energy added to a substance that is not changing state causes the substance’s temperature to

tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

increase

Explanation:

Conduction involves the transfer of electric charge or thermal energy due to the movement of particles. When the conduction relates to electric charge, it is known as electrical conduction while when it relates to thermal energy, it is known as heat conduction. Conductors include metal, steel, aluminum, copper, frying pan, pot, spoon etc.

In the process of heat conduction, thermal energy is usually transferred from fast moving particles to slow moving particles during the collision of these particles. Also, thermal energy is typically transferred between objects that has different degrees of temperature and materials (particles) that are directly in contact with each other but differ in their ability to accept or give up electrons.

Hence, thermal energy added to a substance that is not changing state causes the substance’s temperature to increase because it would absorb energy in the form of heat.

6 0

2 years ago

By what factor would a scuba diver’s lungs expand if she ascended rapidly to the surface from a depth of 125 ft without inhaling

vova2212 [387]

It is found that scuba diver’s can safely ascend up to 52.53 ft without Breathing out.

By what factor would a scuba diver’s lungs expand if she ascended rapidly to the surface from a depth of 125 ft without inhaling or exhaling then

$p_{1}$ =patm+ $pH_{2} O$