Answer:
4
Explanation:
The following equation, which depicts the combustion of propane, is given in this question as follows:
C3H8 + 02 → CO2 + H2O
However, this equation is not yet BALANCED because the number of atoms of each element is not the same on the reactant and product side. To balance the equation, we make use of COEFFICIENT to ensure that the number of atoms of each element on both side correlates.
The balanced equation is as follows:
C3H8 + 502 → 3CO2 + 4H2O
Therefore, the coefficient for water (H2O) after balancing the equation is 4.
The gaining of electron by an atom results in the formation of anion shown by the negative charge on the atom whereas lose of electron results in the formation of cation shown by positive charge on the atom. The atom lose or gain electron to complete their octet and get stable in nature.
The chlorine atom will gain an electron and form chloride anion with one negative charge on it. The chloride ion is more stable in nature compared to the chlorine atom due to complete octet of chloride ion by gaining of electron.
Electronic configuration of chlorine atom is:
By gaining of one electron, electronic configuration of chloride ion is:
Thus, the equation that shows the formation of the chloride ion from a neutral chlorine atom is:
cell membrane - phospholipd bilayer
pigmented - chloroplasts
chloroplasts - oval shaped with two membranes
rectangular or cubed - plant cell
nucleus - control centre
hope that's what you are looking for
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
The catalyst would increase the rate of the forward reaction...
And increase the rate of the backward to the same extent thus not affecting equilibrium.