Answer:
No real solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Work is on another question for this. You have asked it multiple times
Answer:
39
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the smallest number be n,
then the three numbers are n, n+1 and n+2
Therefore, n+(n+1)+(n+2)=120
Collecting like terms,
n+n+n=120-1-2
3n=117
n=117/3
n=39
Therefore the numbers are 39,40 and 41.
And the smallest number is 39.
Given:
- Lily bought 20.24 pounds of grapefruit.
- The lightest grapefruit weighed 1.2 pounds.
- The heaviest grapefruit weighed 1.8 pounds.
To Find:
An estimate of the number of grapefruits she bought.
Answer:
The best estimate is that Lily bought 13 grapefruits.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the lightest grapefruit weighed 1.2 pounds and the heaviest one weighed 1.8 pounds, we can take the mean or average of these two weights to estimate the weight of any of the grapefruits that she bought.
That is, we can say that each grapefruit must weigh something close to the average value.
The average can be found as

Thus, the average grapefruit from the bundle she bought must weigh around 1.5 pounds.
Now, given that the total weight of the grapefruit she bought is 20.24 pounds.
By the Unitary Method,
Weight of One Grapefruit = Total Weight of All Grapefruits ÷ Number of Grapefruits
So, number of grapefruits she bought = Total weight ÷ weight of one grapefruit
In other words,
number of grapefruit = 
Rounding off, we may say that Lily bought 13 grapefruits.
Answer:
The inequality for amount x (in dollars) is given by
x ≤ $33 - (cost of necklace).
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the cost of the necklace be $ y.
The amount for the necklace is constant and it is less than $33 and it is also known that the amount for the necklace will be spent.
Therefore after the necklace has been purchased and the amount deducted from $33 the remaining amount can be used completely or partly to purchase the other item.
Let the cost in dollars of the other item be $x.
The inequality for amount x (in dollars) is given by
x ≤ $33 - (cost of necklace)