Answer:
Yes, it is reasonable to neglect it.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, a single molecule of oxygen weights 32 g (diatomic oxygen) thus, the mass of kilograms is (consider Avogadro's number):

After that, we compute the potential energy 1.00 m above the reference point:

Then, we compute the average kinetic energy at the specified temperature:

Whereas
stands for the Avogadro's number for which we have:

In such a way, since the average kinetic energy energy is about 12000 times higher than the potential energy, it turns out reasonable to neglect the potential energy.
Regards.
Answer:
The coefficient of kinetic friction between the puck and the ice is 0.11
Explanation:
Given;
initial speed, u = 9.3 m/s
sliding distance, S = 42 m
From equation of motion we determine the acceleration;
v² = u² + 2as
0 = (9.3)² + (2x42)a
- 84a = 86.49
a = -86.49/84
|a| = 1.0296
= ma
where;
Fk is the frictional force
μk is the coefficient of kinetic friction
N is the normal reaction = mg
μkmg = ma
μkg = a
μk = a/g
where;
g is the gravitational constant = 9.8 m/s²
μk = a/g
μk = 1.0296/9.8
μk = 0.11
Therefore, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the puck and the ice is 0.11
Answer:
it is chemical reactivity (D)
Explanation:
it is because chemical properties are properties that can be measured and observed only when matter undergoes a change to become an entirely different kind of matter.Which they include Chemical reactivity,flammable,and the ability to rust.And Chemical reactivity is the ability of matter to react chemically with other substances.
It’s C I hope it helps you
There is no factor on your list of choices that has any effect.