Answer
given,
mass of satellite = 545 Kg
R = 6.4 x 10⁶ m
H = 2 x 6.4 x 10⁶ m
Mass of earth = 5.972 x 10²⁴ Kg
height above earth is equal to earth's mean radius
a) satellite's orbital velocity
centripetal force acting on satellite = 
gravitational force = 
equating both the above equation



v = 5578.5 m/s
b) 


T = 14416.92 s

T = 4 hr
c) gravitational force acting


F = 5202 N
To solve this problem, we use the equation:
<span>d = (v^2 - v0^2) /
2a</span>
where,
d = distance of collapse
v0 = initial velocity = 101 km / h = 28.06 m / s
v = final velocity = 0
a = acceleration = - 300 m / s^2
d = (-28.06 m / s)^2 / (2 * - 300 m / s^2)
<span>d = 1.31 m</span>
As thermal energy increases, there is more particle movement. As thermal energy increases, there is more particle movement. As thermal energy increases, there is less particle movement.
Sure hope this helps you
Answer:
Kinetic energy does not stay the same at all heights
Explanation:
Well as the height and wind increase so does the kinetic energy it's like when you fall as you are about to hit the floor you speed increases
HOPE THIS HELPS YA :)
Answer:
The correct answer is the third option: The kinetic energy of the water molecules decreases.
Explanation:
Temperature is, in depth, a statistical value; kind of an average of the particles movement in any physical system (such as a glass filled with water). Kinetic energy, for sure, is the energy resulting from movement (technically depending on mass and velocity of a system; in other words, the faster something moves, the greater its kinetic energy.
Since temperature is related to the total average random movement in a system, and so is the kinetic energy (related to movement through velocity), as the thermometer measures <u>less temperature</u>, that would mean that the particles (in this case: water particles) are <u>moving slowly</u>, so that: the slower something moves, the lower its kinetic energy.
<u>In summary:</u> temperature tells about how fast are moving and colliding the particles within a system, and since it is <em>directly proportional</em> to the amount of movement, it can be related (also <em>directly proportional</em>) to the kinectic energy.