All categories

2 years ago

How much of the universe is believed to consist of ordinary atoms that can be detected?

1 answer:

4 0

The universe believed to be has no limit in space and the elements, molecules and different kind of gases are found in this area. So the percentage of that is believed that and ordinary atom can be detected is C. 3% i hope you understand my answer.

You might be interested in

You are designing a 108 cm3 right circular cylindrical can whose manufacture will take waste into account. There is no waste in

FinnZ [79.3K]

Explanation:

It is given that,

The volume of a right circular cylindrical, $V=108\ cm^3$

We know that the volume of the cylinder is given by :

$V=\pi r^2 h$

$108=\pi r^2 h$

$h=\dfrac{108}{\pi r^2}$ ............(1)

The upper area is given by :

$A=32r^2+2\pi rh$

$A=32r^2+2\pi r\times \dfrac{108}{\pi r^2}$

$A=32r^2+\dfrac{216}{r}$

For maximum area, differentiate above equation wrt r such that, we get :

$\dfrac{dA}{dr}=64r-\dfrac{216}{r^2}$

$64r-\dfrac{216}{r^2}=0$

$r^3=\dfrac{216}{64}$

r = 1.83 m

Dividing equation (1) with r such that,

$\dfrac{h}{r}=\dfrac{108}{\pi r}$

$\dfrac{h}{r}=\dfrac{108}{\pi 1.83}$

$\dfrac{h}{r}=59 \pi$

Hence, this is the required solution.

8 0

3 years ago

How are some types of collisions different from others?

lyudmila [28]

There are two general types of collisions, inelastic and elastic.
Inelastic collisions occur when two objects collide but neither of them bounce away from each other.
Collisions in which the objects do not touch each other are elastic. (Ex: Rutherford Scattering)

3 0

3 years ago

Help me please !!!!!

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

confounding cause they had exposure to many programmes

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A baseball is located at the surface of the earth. Which statements about it are correct? (There may be more than one correct ch

lakkis [162]

i think that the answer is a)

3 0

3 years ago

PLZ! PLZ! PLZ! HELP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Scientific Claim Engaging in scientific argument is a critical piece to the applicati

Nastasia [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

1The study of science and engineering should produce a sense of the process of argument necessary for advancing and defending a new idea or an explanation of a phenomenon and the norms for conducting such arguments. In that spirit, students should argue for the explanations they construct, defend their interpretations of the associated data, and advocate for the designs they propose. (NRC Framework, 2012, p. 73)

Argumentation is a process for reaching agreements about explanations and design solutions. In science, reasoning and argument based on evidence are essential in identifying the best explanation for a natural phenomenon. In engineering, reasoning and argument are needed to identify the best solution to a design problem. Student engagement in scientific argumentation is critical if students are to understand the culture in which scientists live, and how to apply science and engineering for the benefit of society. As such, argument is a process based on evidence and reasoning that leads to explanations acceptable by the scientific community and design solutions acceptable by the engineering community.

Argument in science goes beyond reaching agreements in explanations and design solutions. Whether investigating a phenomenon, testing a design, or constructing a model to provide a mechanism for an explanation, students are expected to use argumentation to listen to, compare, and evaluate competing ideas and methods based on their merits. Scientists and engineers engage in argumentation when investigating a phenomenon, testing a design solution, resolving questions about measurements, building data models, and using evidence to evaluate claims.

Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts.

Respectfully provide and receive critiques about one’s explanations, procedures, models and questions by citing relevant evidence and posing and responding to questions that elicit pertinent elaboration and detail.

Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support or refute an explanation or a model for a phenomenon or a solution to a problem.

Make an oral or written argument that supports or refutes the advertised performance of a device, process, or system, based on empirical evidence concerning whether or not the technology meets relevant criteria and constraints.

Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria.

8 0

2 years ago