Explanation:
Whenever an object is at its highest point, the velocity and acceleration of the object is zero.
Answer:I=12 A
Explanation:
Given
Resistance 
Voltage 
According to ohm's law current through a conductor is directly proportional to the voltage applied.


where V=Voltage
I=Current
R=resistance



The force between the two objects is 19.73 nN.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Any force acting between two objects tends to be directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two objects. And this kind of attraction force between two objects is termed as gravitational force.
So if we consider
and
as the masses of both objects and let d be the distance of separation of two objects. Then the force between the two objects can be determined as below:

As gravitational constant
,
= 20 kg and
= 100 kg, while d = 2.6 m, then

Thus, we get finally,

As we know, nano denoted by letter 'n' equals to 
So the force acting between two objects is 19.73 nN.
Answer:
A: used has four times the tensile strength of steel and the timber frame, incorporating
Explanation:
Option A is correct because it conveys the correct message intended by the statement and has no grammatical errors.
Option B is wrong because to say "has four times the tensile strength of steel has" is just grammatically and idiomatically wrong as has is used twice in the sentence.
Option C is wrong because the statement that has to do with the flexibility of the timber's frame is more like a separate fact and does not fall under the scope of trying to further explain a fact.
Option D is wrong because it has the same problem in Option C. The comma that is placed after "steel" breaks the sentence and hence does not provide a good understanding of why the building can withstand earthquakes.
Option E is grammatically wrong for using does in the sentence "has four times the tensile strength steel does"
Answer:
we assume that it starts with a velocity of 10m/s. At 2m height above ground level, its velocity decreases at 3m above ground level
for its way down the velocity at 3m on its way down is more than its velocity at 2m on its way down.
Explanation:
A student throws a small rock straight upwards. The rock rises to its highest point and then falls back down. How does the speed of the rock at 2m on the way down compare with its speed at 2m on the way up?
It decreases in speed on its way down and increases in speed on its way down.
it decreases in speed on its way up because the the vertical motion is against the earths gravitational pull on an object to the earth's center
.It increases in speed on his way down because its under the influence of gravity
from newton's equation of motion we can check by
using V^2=u^2+2as
we assume that it starts with a velocity of 10m/s. At 2m height above ground level, its velocity decreases at 3m above ground level
for its way down the velocity at 3m on its way down is more than its velocity at 2m on its way down.