1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katen [24]
3 years ago
11

which statement about waves is false? a. waves transfer matter b. waves can change direction c. waves can interact with each oth

er d. waves can transfer energy to matter
Physics
1 answer:
satela [25.4K]3 years ago
8 0

A.

Waves can transfer energy but they can’t transfer matter

You might be interested in
The closest approach distance between Mars and Earth is about 56 million km. Assume you can travel in a spaceship at 58,000 km/h
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

40.22 days

Explanation:

Given data:

Closest approach distance between Mars and Earth = 56 million km = 56 × 10⁶ km

Speed of the spaceship = 58000 km/h

Now, the time (t) is calculated as:

time = Distance / speed

on substituting the values, we get

t = 56 × 10⁶ km / (58000 km/h)

or

t = 965.517 hours

or

t = 965.517 / 24 days = 40.22 days

6 0
3 years ago
Match the correct center and scale factor to each figure.
34kurt

Answer:

Image

Explanation:

I looked at the graph and assumed answers

5 0
2 years ago
What are neglible weights. Definition? ​
Alex

Answer:

Negligible weights is a change so minor or insignificant to be deemed to have no effect on weight or balance.

4 0
2 years ago
A projectile of mass m is launched with an initial velocity vector v i making an angle θ with the horizontal as shown below. The
sergeinik [125]
Angular momentum is given by the length of the arm to the object, multiplied by the momentum of the object, times the cosine of the angle that the momentum vector makes with the arm. From your illustration, that will be: 
<span>L = R * m * vi * cos(90 - theta) </span>

<span>cos(90 - theta) is just sin(theta) </span>
<span>and R is the distance the projectile traveled, which is vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>so, we have: L = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) * m * vi * sin(theta) / g </span>

<span>We can combine the two vi terms and get: </span>

<span>L = vi^3 * m * sin(theta) * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>What's interesting is that angular momentum varies with the *cube* of the initial velocity. This is because, not only does increased velocity increase the translational momentum of the projectile, but it increase the *moment arm*, too. Also note that there might be a trig identity which lets you combine the two sin() terms, but nothing jumps out at me right at the moment. </span>

<span>Now, for the first part... </span>

<span>There are a few ways to attack this. Basically, you have to find the angle from the origin to the apogee (highest point) in the arc. Once we have that, we'll know what angle the momentum vector makes with the moment-arm because, at the apogee, we know that all of the motion is *horizontal*. </span>

<span>Okay, so let's get back to what we know: </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>where d is the distance (length to the arm), m is mass, v is velocity, and phi is the angle the velocity vector makes with the arm. Let's take these one by one... </span>

<span>m is still m. </span>
<span>v is going to be the *hoizontal* component of the initial velocity (all the vertical component got eliminated by the acceleration of gravity). So, v = vi * cos(theta) </span>
<span>d is going to be half of our distance R in part two (because, ignoring friction, the path of the projectile is a perfect parabola). So, d = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g </span>

<span>That leaves us with phi, the angle the horizontal velocity vector makes with the moment arm. To find *that*, we need to know what the angle from the origin to the apogee is. We can find *that* by taking the arc-tangent of the slope, if we know that. Well, we know the "run" part of the slope (it's our "d" term), but not the rise. </span>

<span>The easy way to get the rise is by using conservation of energy. At the apogee, all of the *vertical* kinetic energy at the time of launch (1/2 * m * (vi * sin(theta))^2 ) has been turned into gravitational potential energy ( m * g * h ). Setting these equal, diving out the "m" and dividing "g" to the other side, we get: </span>

<span>h = 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g </span>

<span>So, there's the rise. So, our *slope* is rise/run, so </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g ] / [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g ] </span>

<span>The "g"s cancel. Astoundingly the "vi"s cancel, too. So, we get: </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ sin(2*theta) ] </span>

<span>(It's not too alarming that slope-at-apogee doesn't depend upon vi, since that only determines the "magnitude" of the arc, but not it's shape. Whether the overall flight of this thing is an inch or a mile, the arc "looks" the same). </span>

<span>Okay, so... using our double-angle trig identities, we know that sin(2*theta) = 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta), so... </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta) ] = tan(theta)/4 </span>

<span>Okay, so the *angle* (which I'll call "alpha") that this slope makes with the x-axis is just: arctan(slope), so... </span>

<span>alpha = arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Alright... last bit. We need "phi", the angle the (now-horizontal) momentum vector makes with that slope. Draw it on paper and you'll see that phi = 180 - alpha </span>

<span>so, phi = 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Now, we go back to our original formula and plug it ALL in... </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>becomes... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>

<span>Now, cos(180 - something) = cos(something), so we can simplify a little bit... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
b. Comparing and Contrasting Compare the change in atmospheric pressure with elevation to the change in water pressure with dept
olasank [31]

Answer:

fftgjjjuhgybcrgjjuhg ui

Explanation:

trggfyh

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the connections between reactants, products, and limiting reactant.
    9·1 answer
  • A 100 kilogram clown is fired 15 meters per second from a 500-kilogram cannon. What is the recoil speed of the cannon?
    8·1 answer
  • Choose all the answers that apply. Confirmation bias ___.
    15·1 answer
  • Mars' atmosphere is mostly made of _____. A. helium B. nitrogen C. water vapor D. carbon dioxide
    11·1 answer
  • What are the signs of a chemical change
    14·1 answer
  • The vector quantity that causes torsional acceleration of a rigid system is called ____
    5·1 answer
  • A crane lifts a 425 kg steel beam vertically a distance of 64 m. How much work does the crane do on the beam if the beam acceler
    10·1 answer
  • Calculate the volume of this regular solid,
    11·1 answer
  • A piece of wood that floats on water has a mass of 0.0175 kg. A lead sinker is tied to the wood, and the apparent mass with the
    7·1 answer
  • It is class 12th physics questions can anyone help me ​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!