The law of physics that this scenario would violate is the law of conservation of energy.
<h3>What is the law of conservation of energy?</h3>
The law of conservation of energy states that energy possessed by an object or physical body can neither be created nor destroyed but can only be transformed from one form to another.
This ultimately implies that, the energy possessed by the rock at the beginning must be equal to the energy possessed by the rock at the end in accordance with the law of conservation of energy.
Read more on energy here: brainly.com/question/1242059
The unit to express work is called Joule.
Answer:
The answer is based on the conservation of energy law; something you should really understand by now.
For convenience we can hold one of the two charges still; it becomes the frame of reference. And everything we say is in reference to the designated static charge, call it Q.
So the moving charge, call it q, has total energy TE = PE. It's all potential energy as we start with q not moving.
It has potential energy because in order to separate q from Q, we had to do work, add energy, on q. And from the COE law, that work added is converted into PE.
It's a bit like lifting something off the ground. That's work and it becomes GPE. So there's some work, in separating the two charges in the first place.
But there's more.
Now we let q go. As opposites attract, q is pulled to Q. And that force from Q is working on q, force over distance. Which means the potential energy q started with is being converted into kinetic energy. q is accelerating and picking up speed.
And there's more work, done by the EMF on charge q. That converts the PE into KE and the q charge smashes into Q with some kinetic energy.
The particles are either being absorbed or evaporating
Answer:
The path of an object in uniform motion is a straight line.