Answer:
10 seconds
Explanation:
We have the equation V = at (speed = acceleration x time)
We want to find the time, so can rearrange to T = V/a (time = speed / acceleration).
From the question, we know V is 5 and a is 0.5.
Now we can substitute that into our equation: 5/0.5 = 10.
So the time is 10 seconds.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions :)
Practically yes
So
If mass is more output may come less so it affects the efficiency practically
But thepritically it doesn't
Answer:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Explanation:
The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).
None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.
Explanation:
In the given situation two forces are working. These are:
1) Electric force (acting in the downward direction) = qE
2) weight (acting in the downward direction) = mg
Therefore, work done by all the forces = change in kinetic energy
Hence,
It is known that the weight of electron is far less compared to electric force. Therefore, we can neglect the weight and the above equation will be as follows.

v = 
= 592999 m/s
Since, the electron is travelling downwards it means that it looses the potential energy.
Answer:
<u><em>a. True</em></u>
Explanation:
<em>Vectors are an important part of the language of science, mathematics, and engineering.</em>