The given question is incomplete. The complete question is:What is the relative atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances.
Isotope mass amu Relative abundance
1 77.9 14.4
2 81.9 14.3
3 85.9 71.3
Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.
Answer: 84.2 amu
Explanation:
Mass of isotope 1 = 77.9
% abundance of isotope 1 = 14.4% = 
Mass of isotope 2 = 81.9
% abundance of isotope 2 = 14.3% = 
Mass of isotope 3 = 85.9
% abundance of isotope 2 = 71.3% = 
Formula used for average atomic mass of an element :

![A=\sum[(77.9\times 0.144)+(81.9\times 0.143)+(85.9\times 0.713)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%5Csum%5B%2877.9%5Ctimes%200.144%29%2B%2881.9%5Ctimes%200.143%29%2B%2885.9%5Ctimes%200.713%29%5D)

Therefore, the average atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances is 84.2 amu
There is no effect on the equilibrium when sodium formate is added to a solution of formic acid for hcooh( aq) + h ( aq) right arrow choo –( aq).
Equilibrium is characterized as a state of equilibrium or a stable situation in which conflicting forces balance one another out and no changes are taking place. In terms of economics, equilibrium occurs when supply and demand are equal. When you are composed and steady, you are in an equilibrium state.
An object is considered to be in an equilibrium condition when all of the forces acting on it are in balance. If the upward forces are equal to the descending forces and the rightward forces are equal to the leftward forces, then the forces are said to be balanced. Several instances of equilibrium include a book that is open and at rest. a vehicle that is going steadily.
To learn more about equilibrium please visit -
brainly.com/question/14602120
#SPJ4
Answer:
iron and carbon:steel:copper and tin: metal
Answer:
I would put the final answer choice: "Scientists must first develop certain technologies before missions can be completed"
Explanation:
The first option is partially true, but we have ways around it.
The second option is straight-up false.
The third option doesn't make much sense, how can one work with technology that will be developed in the future and doesn't yet exist?
Therefore, the fourth option is the best.
Hope this helps
-cyber