1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinvika [58]
3 years ago
12

a ball of mass 100g moving at a velocity of 100m/s collides with another ball of mass 400g moving at 50m/s in same direction, if

they stick together calculate the velocity and loss of energy​
Physics
1 answer:
klio [65]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Velocity of the two balls after collision: 60\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}.

100\; \rm J of kinetic energy would be lost.

Explanation:

<h3>Velocity</h3>

Because the question asked about energy, convert all units to standard units to keep the calculation simple:

  • Mass of the first ball: 100\; \rm g = 0.1\; \rm kg.
  • Mass of the second ball: 400\; \rm g = 0.4 \; \rm kg.

The two balls stick to each other after the collision. In other words, this collision is a perfectly inelastic collision. Kinetic energy will not be conserved. The velocity of the two balls after the collision can only be found using the conservation of momentum.

Assume that the system of the two balls is isolated. Thus, the sum of the momentum of the two balls will stay the same before and after the collision.

The momentum of an object of mass m and velocity v is: p = m \cdot v.

Momentum of the two balls before collision:

  • First ball: p = m \cdot v = 0.1\; \rm kg \times 100\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1} = 10\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}.
  • Second ball: p = m \cdot v = 0.4\; \rm kg \times 50\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1} = 20\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}.
  • Sum: 10\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1} + 20 \; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1} = 30 \; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1} given that the two balls are moving in the same direction.

Based on the assumptions, the sum of the momentum of the two balls after collision should also be 30\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}. The mass of the two balls, combined, is 0.1\; \rm kg + 0.4\; \rm kg = 0.5\; \rm kg. Let the velocity of the two balls after the collision v\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}. (There's only one velocity because the collision had sticked the two balls to each other.)

  • Momentum after the collision from p = m \cdot v: (0.5\, v)\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1.
  • Momentum after the collision from the conservation of momentum: 30\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}.

These two values are supposed to describe the same quantity: the sum of the momentum of the two balls after the collision. They should be equal to each other. That gives the equation about v:

0.5\, v = 30.

v = 60.

In other words, the velocity of the two balls right after the collision should be 60\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}.

<h3>Kinetic Energy</h3>

The kinetic energy of an object of mass m and velocity v is \displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\, m \cdot v^{2}.

Kinetic energy before the collision:

  • First ball: \displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \, m \cdot v^2 = \frac{1}{2}\times 0.1\; \rm kg \times \left(100\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}\right)^{2} = 500\; \rm J.
  • Second ball: \displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \, m \cdot v^2 = \frac{1}{2}\times 0.4\; \rm kg \times \left(50\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}\right)^{2} = 500\; \rm J.
  • Sum: 500\; \rm J + 500\; \rm J = 1000\; \rm J.

The two balls stick to each other after the collision. Therefore, consider them as a single object when calculating the sum of their kinetic energies.

  • Mass of the two balls, combined: 0.5\; \rm kg.
  • Velocity of the two balls right after the collision: 60\; \rm m\cdot s^{-1}.

Sum of the kinetic energies of the two balls right after the collision:

\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \, m \cdot v^{2} = \frac{1}{2}\times 0.5\; \rm kg \times \left(60\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}\right)^2 = 900\; \rm J.

Therefore, 1000\; \rm J - 900\; \rm J = 100\; \rm J of kinetic energy would be lost during this collision.

You might be interested in
When tuning a guitar, by comparing the frequency of a string that is struck against a standard sound source (of known frequency)
lapo4ka [179]
Bdjsbevevfbfcnbfbffbs s kdkfc
5 0
3 years ago
How many nanoseconds does it take light to travel 3.50 ft in vacuum?
Fiesta28 [93]
Answer:3.56 nanosecond

In this case, you are asked the time and given the light distance(3.5ft)
To answer this question you would need to know the velocity of light. Speed of light is <span>299792458m/s. Then the calculation would be:

time= distance/speed
time= 3.5 ft / (</span>299792458m/s) x 0.3048 meter/ 1 ft=  3.56 10^{-9} second or 3.56 nanosecond
6 0
3 years ago
3. Read this sentence from the text: "Most of the solar radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere
Semmy [17]
I think the answer is A
6 0
3 years ago
Question 1
ella [17]
I think the answer maybe C
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An increase in a sound's pitch corresponds to an increase in what other property?
Wittaler [7]
An increase in a sound's pitch corresponds to an increase in the frequency!
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is there more potentioal energy at the top of bottom of a ramp?
    5·1 answer
  • A 350-g air track cart is traveling at 1.25 m/s and a 280-g cart traveling in the opposite direction at 1.33 m/s. What is the sp
    10·1 answer
  • What makes a hypothesis testable
    6·2 answers
  • What do I do if someone is choking me with both of their hands, inside of the classroom and the teacher isn't around? How do I g
    8·1 answer
  • In a research facility, a person lies on a horizontal platform which floats on a film of air. When the person's heart beats, it
    14·2 answers
  • Materials that allow electricity to pass through them are called ?
    8·1 answer
  • Different between cell and dynamo short and sweet ​
    12·1 answer
  • How electromagnet works in circuit breaker
    12·1 answer
  • Có mấy cách đo đại lượng vật lí
    15·1 answer
  • How can geo thermal energy be used ?​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!