Answer:
>>pounds=13.2
>>kilos=pounds/2.2
Explanation:
Using Matlab to write the program, consider at any time when the weight in pounds is 13.2 lb, this variable of weight is created in MATLAB by typing >>pounds=13.2. To convert it from lb to Kg, we simply divide it by 2.2 hence the second command to created is kilos. For this, the output of the program will be 6 Kg.
Answer:
c is the answer because we have to double the number
Answer:
diameter of the sprue at the bottom is 1.603 cm
Explanation:
Given data;
Flow rate, Q = 400 cm³/s
cross section of sprue: Round
Diameter of sprue at the top 
= 3.4 cm
Height of sprue, h = 20 cm = 0.2 m
acceleration due to gravity g = 9.81 m/s²
Calculate the velocity at the sprue base
= √2gh
we substitute
= √(2 × 9.81 m/s² × 0.2 m )
= 1.98091 m/s
= 198.091 cm/s
diameter of the sprue at the bottom will be;
Q = AV = (π
/4) ×
= √(4Q/π)
we substitute our values into the equation;
= √(4(400 cm³/s) / (π×198.091 cm/s))
= 1.603 cm
Therefore, diameter of the sprue at the bottom is 1.603 cm
If ceramic vessels are typed together based as they were all used as storage containers, in spite of the fact that design elements indicate they are from different time periods, then they have to be functional typeoperational typesystematic type is given below
Explanation:
The Batiscan site, excavated in the 1960s, produced one of the largest Vinette I collections known to date. Revisiting this ceramic assemblage has revealed more heterogeneity than is generally recognized within the Vinette I type of pottery. Indeed, variations from the typological definition exist, both within and between Early Woodland ceramic collections. A number of diagnostic traits, such as the presence of exterior and interior cord impressions and the absence of decoration, are challenged by the present study. It is hypothesized that part of this variability is chronological, and that the vessels from Batiscan were manufactured closer to the end of the Early Woodland period. However, other factors, such as the frequency and scale of production, and the possible exchange and circulation of ceramic containers, must also be taken into account when interpreting Vinette I variability.l
