Answer:
(a) Magnetic moment will be 
(b) Torque will be 
Explanation:
We have given dimension of the rectangular 5.4 cm × 8.5 cm
So area of the rectangular coil 
Current is given as 
Number of turns N = 25
(A) We know that magnetic moment is given by 
(b) Magnetic field is given as B = 0.350 T
We know that torque is given by 
Answer:
257.32
Explanation:
I jus worked it out on paper. Brainliest please?
A physical change in something doesn't change what the it is. For example, if you break glass, it will still be glass. In a chemical change where there is a chemical reaction, a new thing is formed and energy is either given off or absorbed. For example, when you burn a log. The carbon in the log is reacting to the oxygen to create ashe and smoke
Answer
(C).
When there is an angle between the two directions, the cosine of the angle must be considered.
Step by step Solution
The work done by a force is defined as the product of the force and the distance traveled in the direction of motion.
The first answer "Only the component of the force perpendicular to the motion is used to calculate the work" is wrong because, the force perpendicular to motion does no work.
The second choice "If the force acts in the same direction as the motion, then no work is done" is wrong because the work in the direction of the force is
.
Fourth answer "A force at a right angle to the motion requires the use of the sine of the angle" is wrong because the
meaning that there is no work done in the direction perpendicular to the motion.
The third answer" When there is an angle between the two directions, the cosine of the angle must be considered." is correct because the work is calculated using the force in the direction of the motion. The magnitude of this force is 
Because it's literally impossible to tell exactly where something that size is
located at any particular time.
And that's NOT because it's so small that we can't see it. It's because any
material object behaves as if it's made of waves, and the smaller the object is,
the more the size of its waves get to be like the same size as the object.
When you get down to things the size of subatomic particles, it doesn't make
sense any more to try and talk about where the particle actually "is", and we only
talk about the waves that define it, and how the waves all combine to become a
cloud of <em><u>probability</u></em> of where the particle is.
I know it sounds weird. But that's the way it is. Sorry.