Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

12

A thin spherical shell with radius R1 = 4.00 cm is concentric with a larger thin spherical shell with radius R2 = 6.00 cm . Both

shells are made of insulating material. The smaller shell has charge q1=+6.00nC distributed uniformly over its surface, and the larger shell has charge q2=−9.00nC distributed uniformly over its surface. Take the electric potential to be zero at an infinite distance from both shells.

1 answer:

kakasveta [241]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The right response will be "450 volts".

Explanation:

The given values are:

R1 = 4.00 cm

R2 = 6.00 cm

q1 = +6.00 nC

q2 = −9.00 nC

As we know,

The potential difference between the two shell's difference will be:

⇒ $\Delta V=K[(\frac{q1}{R1}+\frac{q2}{R2})-(\frac{q1}{R1} +(\frac{q2}{R2}))]$

$=K[\frac{q1}{R2}-\frac{q1}{R1} ]$

On substituting the values, we get

$=(9\times 10^9)[\frac{6\times 10^{-9}}{0.04}-\frac{6\times 10^{-9}}{0.06}]$

Δ $=450 \ volts$

You might be interested in

Heat can be transferred in several ways. Which of the following is an example of conduction? (DOK 2) A The sun is shining on a m

forsale [732]

Answer:

Explanation:

G yvyvybybybububunununu

8 0

3 years ago

7.22 Ignoring reflection at the air–water boundary, if the amplitude of a 1 GHz incident wave in air is 20 V/m at the water surf

Serga [27]

Answer:

z = 0.8 (approx)

Explanation:

given,

Amplitude of 1 GHz incident wave in air = 20 V/m

Water has,

μr = 1

at 1 GHz, r = 80 and σ = 1 S/m.

depth of water when amplitude is down to 1 μV/m

Intrinsic impedance of air = 120 π Ω

Intrinsic impedance of water = $\dfrac{120\pi}{\epsilon_r}$

Using equation to solve the problem

$E(z) = E_0 e^{-\alpha\ z}$

E(z) is the amplitude under water at z depth

E_o is the amplitude of wave on the surface of water

z is the depth under water

$\alpha = \dfrac{\sigma}{2}\sqrt{\dfrac{(120\pi)^2}{\Epsilon_r}}$

$\alpha = \dfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{\dfrac{(120\pi)^2}{80}}$

$\alpha =21.07\ Np/m$

now ,

$1 \times 10^{-6} = 20 e^{-21.07\times z}$

$e^{21.07\times z}= 20\times 10^{6}$

taking ln both side

21.07 x z = 16.81

z = 0.797

z = 0.8 (approx)

5 0

3 years ago

A Hall probe, consisting of a rectangular slab of current-carrying material, is calibrated by placing it in a known magnetic fie

Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

(a) 0.345 T

(b) 0.389 T

Solution:

As per the question:

Hall emf, $V_{Hall} = 20\ mV = 0.02\ V$

Magnetic Field, B = 0.10 T

Hall emf, $V'_{Hall} = 69\ mV = 0.069\ V$

Now,

Drift velocity, $v_{d} = \frac{V_{Hall}}{B}$

$v_{d} = \frac{0.02}{0.10} = 0.2\ m/s$

Now, the expression for the electric field is given by:

$E_{Hall} = Bv_{d}sin\theta$ (1)

And

$E_{Hall} = V_{Hall}d$

Thus eqn (1) becomes

$V_{Hall}d = dBv_{d}sin\theta$

where

d = distance

$B = \frac{V_{Hall}}{v_{d}sin\theta}$ (2)

(a) When $\theta = 90^{\circ}$

$B = \frac{0.069}{0.2\times sin90} = 0.345\ T$

(b) When $\theta = 60^{\circ}$

$B = \frac{0.069}{0.2\times sin60} = 0.398\ T$

5 0

3 years ago

Which runner has greater kinetic energy: a 45 kg runner moving at a speed of 7 m per second or a 93 kg runner moving at a

bagirrra123 [75]

Kinetic Energy = (1/2) (mass) (speed)

First runner: KE = (1/2) (45kg) (49 m/s) = 1,102.5 Joules

Second runner: KE = (1/2) (93kg) (9 m/s) = 418.5 Joules

The <em>first runner </em><em>has 163</em>% more kinetic energy than the second runner has.

7 0

2 years ago

What is a direct result of having greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?

Shalnov [3]

Answer:

Well this is tough. I'm not sure but you are smart and can push through it. YOU DONT need the someone telling you the answer when it is inside you.

hope this helps p

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers