1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mnenie [13.5K]
3 years ago
10

Someone please help Me! Solve each system of equation. I need help I don’t understand and this is due tomorrow. I’ll make brainl

iest if I can and 20points

Mathematics
1 answer:
mestny [16]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

  (a, b, c) = (-2, -3, 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

The idea is to find values of a, b, and c that satisfy all three equations. Any of the methods you learned for systems of 2 equations in 2 variables will work with 3 equations in 3 variables. Often, folks find the "elimination" method to be about the easiest to do by hand.

Here, we notice that the coefficients in general are not nice multiples of each other. However, the coefficient of "a" in the second equation is 1, so we can use that to eliminate "a" from the other equations.

__

Add 3 times the second equation to the first.

  3(a +3b -4c) +(-3a -4b +2c) = 3(-31) +(28)

  3a +9b -12c -3a -4b +2c = -93 +28 . . . . eliminate parentheses

  5b -10c = -65 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .collect terms

  b - 2c = -13 . . . . . . . divide by 5 (because we can) "4th equation"

Subtract 2 times the second equation from the third.

  (2a +3c) -2(a +3b -4c) = (11) -2(-31)

  2a +3c -2a -6b +8c = 11 +62

  -6b +11c = 73 . . . . . . "5th equation"

Now, we have two equations in b and c that we can solve in any of the ways we know for 2-variable equations. Once again, it looks convenient to use the first of these (4th equation) to eliminate the b variable. (That is why we made its coefficient be 1 instead of leaving it as 5.)

Add 6 times the 4th equation to the 5th equation:

  6(b -2c) + (-6b +11c) = 6(-13) +(73)

  6b -12c -6b +11c = -78 +73 . . . . . . . eliminate parentheses

  -c = -5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . collect terms

  c = 5 . . . . . multiply by -1

We can now work backwards to find the other variable values. Substituting into the 4th equation, we have ...

  b -2(5) = -13 . . . .substitute for c

  b = -3 . . . . . . . . . add 10

And the values for b and c can be substituted into the 2nd equation.

  a + 3(-3) -4(5) = -31

  a -9 -20 = -31 . . . . . eliminate parentheses

  a = -2 . . . . . . . . . . . . add 29

__

The solution to this set of equations is (a, b, c) = (-2, -3, 5).

_____

<em>Comment on steps</em>

At each stage, we made choices calculated to simplify the process. By using equations that had a variable coefficient of 1, we avoided messy fractions or multiplying by more numbers than necessary when we used the elimination process. That is, the procedure is guided by the idea of <em>elimination</em>, but the specific steps are <em>ad hoc</em>. Using <em>these same specific steps</em> on different equations will likely be useless.

_____

<em>Alternate solution methods</em>

The coefficients of these equations can be put into the form called an "augmented matrix" as follows:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}-3&-4&2&28\\1&3&-4&-31\\2&0&3&11\end{array}\right]

Many graphing and/or scientific calculators are able to solve equations written in this form. The function used is the one that puts this matrix into "reduced row-echelon form". The result will look like ...

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&0&0&-2\\0&1&0&-3\\0&0&1&5\end{array}\right]

where the rightmost column is the solution for the variables in the same order they appear in the equations. The vertical line in the body of the matrix may or may not be present in a calculator view. The square matrix to the left of the vertical bar is an identity matrix (1 in each diagonal element) when there is exactly one solution.

You might be interested in
4.22 x 1o^6 + 2.25 x 10^5 + 2.8 x 10^6
denpristay [2]
7245000...hope that helps
8 0
3 years ago
Can anyone help me ?
Eva8 [605]
The answer is right
3 0
3 years ago
A grocery store sells a bag 7 oranges for $2.66. if alexandra spent $3.42 on oranges how many did she buy
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

9 oranges

Step-by-step explanation:

7 for 2.66 is 38c for 1

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can anyone answer this problem in their head. No calculator or paper.
rodikova [14]
7,393,420,225 is the answer tk the problem without using calculator.
7 0
3 years ago
• If 7x +5= 2x +9, then x= ?
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

x=4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What expression is not equivalent to 0
    11·2 answers
  • Calculate the constant of variation if y varies directly as x.
    13·1 answer
  • There are 20 nickels in one dollar. Write an equation to find the number of nickels n in any number of dollars d
    11·1 answer
  • Logan borrowed $24,318.79 and will have to repay a total of $27,174.25. How much interest will he pay?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Can I get help please.
    11·1 answer
  • Y=3x−5 and y=x−1 ​ Is (2,1) a solution of the system?
    11·1 answer
  • - Name a regular polygon with an interior angle of 120 degrees<br>​
    10·1 answer
  • Subtract ( 5 – 8√2 ) from ( -7√2 + 12 )
    12·1 answer
  • Means and SDs. For each part, compare distributions (1) and (2) based on their means and standard deviations. You do not need to
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!