1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
3 years ago
13

Four identical metallic spheres with charges of 2.2 µC, 4.2 µC, −7.4 µC, and −6.8 µC are placed on a piece of paper. The paper i

s lifted on all corners so that the spheres come into contact with each other simultaneously. The paper is then flattened so that the metallic spheres become separated.
(a) What is the resulting charge on each sphere?
(b) How many excess or absent electrons (depending on the sign of your answer to part (a)) correspond to the resulting charge on each sphere?
Physics
1 answer:
Ksenya-84 [330]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Part a)

charge on each sphere is -1.95 micro coulomb

Part b)

For first sphere

N = 2.6 \times 10^{13} excess charge

For second sphere

N = 3.8 \times 10^{13} excess charge

For third sphere

N = 3.4 \times 10^{13} absent charge

For third sphere

N = 3.03 \times 10^{13} absent charge

Explanation:

Part a)

Since all the spheres are of identical size so the total charge of the sphere will divide equally on them

So we have

q = \frac{Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3 + Q_4}{4}

q = \frac{2.2 \mu C + 4.2 \mu C - 7.4 \mu C - 6.8 \mu C}{4}

q = -1.95 \mu C

So charge on each sphere is -1.95 micro coulomb

Part b)

For first sphere

initial charge = 2.2 micro coulomb

final charge = -1.95 micro coulomb

excess charge = -1.95 - 2.2 = -4.15 micro coulomb

Q = Ne

N = \frac{4.15\times 10^{-19}}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}}

N = 2.6 \times 10^{13}

For second sphere

initial charge = 4.2 micro coulomb

final charge = -1.95 micro coulomb

excess charge = -1.95 - 4.2 = -6.15 micro coulomb

Q = Ne

N = \frac{6.15\times 10^{-19}}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}}

N = 3.8 \times 10^{13}

For third sphere

initial charge = -7.4 micro coulomb

final charge = -1.95 micro coulomb

absent charge = -1.95 + 7.4 = 5.45 micro coulomb

Q = Ne

N = \frac{5.45\times 10^{-19}}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}}

N = 3.4 \times 10^{13}

For third sphere

initial charge = -6.8 micro coulomb

final charge = -1.95 micro coulomb

absent charge = -1.95 + 6.8 = 4.85 micro coulomb

Q = Ne

N = \frac{4.85\times 10^{-19}}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}}

N = 3.03 \times 10^{13}

You might be interested in
Consider a constant density gas flowing steadily over an airfoil. Far upstream the velocity is V0. Halfway along the top surface
Mashutka [201]

Answer:

The solution and complete explanation for the above question and mentioned conditions is given below in the attached document.i hope my explanation will help you in understanding this particular question.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Are Carbon and oxygen are both metalloids?
Marizza181 [45]
Just carbon is a metalloid not oxygen
7 0
2 years ago
A cosmic ray (an electron or nucleus moving ar speeds close to the speed of light) travels across the Milky Way at a speed of 0.
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

Cosmic ray's frame of reference: 99,875 years

Stationary frame of reference: 501,891 years

Explanation:

First of all, we convert the distance from parsec into metres:

d=30,000 pc =9.26\cdot 10^{20} m

The speed of the cosmic ray is

v=0.98 c

where

c=3.0 \cdot 10^8 m/s is the speed of light. Substituting,

v=(0.98)(3.0\cdot 10^8)=2.94\cdot 10^8 m/s

And so, the time taken to complete the journey in the cosmic's ray frame of reference (called proper time) is:

T_0 = \frac{d}{v}=\frac{9.26\cdot 10^{20}}{2.94\cdot 10^8}=3.15\cdot 10^{12} s

Converting into years,

T_0 = \frac{3.15\cdot 10^{12}}{(365\cdot 24\cdot 60 \cdot 60}=99,875 years

Instead, the time elapsed in the stationary frame of reference is given by Lorentz transformation:

T=\frac{T_0}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{v}{c^2})^2}}

And substituting v = 0.98c, we find:

T=\frac{99,875}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{0.98c}{c})^2}}=501,891 years

3 0
3 years ago
A scientific theory is an explanation that
Ber [7]

Answer:

A theory is a well thought-out clear explanation for observations of the natural environment

Explanation:

<u>A theory is a well thought-out clear explanation for observations of the natural environment</u> that has been created using the scientific process and that brings together many facts and hypotheses. Theories try to explain observations of the natural world that have been made.

I hope this helps explain the answer to your question and why the answer is that answer.

6 0
2 years ago
If plates are always in motion, why aren't we always having to redraw maps?
Marysya12 [62]

plates move very slow

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When matter changes from one state to another, what do we call this process? A. a physical change B. a nuclear change C. an expl
    14·2 answers
  • Refractive index measures the speed of light in a vacuum to its speed in
    11·1 answer
  • Write the equality and conversion factors for the relationship between miles and hours for a car traveling at 55 mi/h
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the Moon’s positions will cause the highest or spring tides?
    13·2 answers
  • The time required for the passage of one wavelength is the: period frequency amplitude velocity
    14·2 answers
  • What is the gravitational force between mars and Phobos
    9·1 answer
  • Within which type of system is the total energy conserved?
    14·1 answer
  • A 10 gram ball is rolling at 3 m/s. What is the energy the ball has?
    11·1 answer
  • Which option tells the forces that influence the movement of earths plates
    14·1 answer
  • Which statements best describe displacement? Check all that apply.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!