Answer:
When did humans learn that the Earth is not the center of the universe?
Answer
1
Follow
Request
More
Ad by Odoo
Odoo: The open-source CRM!
Keep track of leads and opportunities, personalize sales cycles, and control forecasts with Odoo CRM!
Learn More
4 Answers
Asked in 3 Spaces


Science - Next Generation
Alexander Somm
, Consultant, Investor Relations at Novelpharm AG (2015-present)
Answered Oct 16
What, it isn’t?!
Sorry, I had to.
As far as I have read and understood, the Sumerians and later the Babylonians both had astronomical calendars that already differentiated planets and stars. Earth was not the center to them, the Sun likely was. That was around 2,200 - 1,600 BC.
After that, Greek philosopher Aristarchus of Samos (310 - 230 BC) was the first (recorded) to have believed the solar system was organized around the Sun, rather than the Earth. His heliocentric model was unpopular during Aristarchus’ lifetime, although it would inspire astronomers centuries later, such as Copernicus and Galileo.
Now, there are numerous archeological findings (cave paintings) and studies, that all suggest an understanding of complex astronomy in prehistoric times dating back as far as 40,000 years. This also explains how early, prehistoric migrants may have navigated the seas.
Explanation:
hope it helps
have a good day
Answer:
<h3>1.01 s</h3>
Explanation:
Using the equation of motion S = ut+1/2gt² to solve the problem where;
u is the initial velocity of the chocolate = 0m/s
t is the time taken
g is the acceleration due to gravity = 9.81m/s²
S is the height of fall = 5.0m
Substituting the given parameter into the formula to get the time t we have;
5 = 0(t)+1/2(9.81)t²
5 = 4.905t²
t² = 5/4.905
t² = 1.019
t = √1.019
t = 1.009 secs
<em>Hence it will take 1.01 secs for me to catch the chocolate bar</em>
The most massivest stars end their lives as black holes. <em>(D)</em>
Answer:
Under the reasonable assumption that the brick has more mass than the feather, the brick experiences a greater force of air friction.
Explanation:
<u>Objects at terminal velocity</u>, only under the influence of gravity, have maximized their speed and <u>have an acceleration of zero</u>. Thus, neither object is accelerating.
Recall Newton's second law: 
Since acceleration for each object is zero, the sum of the force acting on each of those objects must also be zero.
Since the only forces acting on the objects are gravity and the force of air friction, in order to zero out, <u>the force of air friction must be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force of gravity</u>.
Recall that near the surface of the earth,
, so <u>the Force of Gravity acting on an object is directly proportional to the object's mass</u>. <em>(A similar argument could be made even if this were not taking place on the surface of the earth, so long as the objects were the same distance from the object providing gravitational influence).</em>
If the masses of the objects are different, <u>the object with the greater mass will experience</u> a larger force of gravity, and hence <u>a larger force of air friction</u> at terminal velocity.
Under the reasonable assumption that the brick has more mass than the feather, the brick experiences a greater force of air friction.