1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garik1379 [7]
3 years ago
10

Which best describes the modern periodic table?

Chemistry
1 answer:
kaheart [24]3 years ago
5 0

answer:

D.

explanation:

as days years months go by more and more new elements that are chemically made or are natural are added even though the ones at school have been updated for such a long period of time

You might be interested in
Burning wood represents a chemical change.<br> True or False?
Strike441 [17]
True
is the answer lol
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do we differentiate chemical change from physical change ​
bija089 [108]

Answer:

Chemical change :has change in mass, heat is needed, new element is formed, hard to reverse.......

Physicalchange:does not have change in mass, heat is not necessary, no new element is formed, easy to reverse

5 0
3 years ago
Could volume by displacement be used to determine the volume of a lump of rock salt? Explain would be nice
Readme [11.4K]

Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:

1).  Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water.  So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease.  If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.

So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve.  I don't know right now what that could
be.  You'd have to shop around and find one.

2).  Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt.  If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under.  If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.

So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.


5 0
3 years ago
The nucleus of an isotope of sulfur contains 34 neutrons. what is the atomic number of this isotope?
Flauer [41]
The atomic number of an element never changes no matter how many neutrons they have so Sulfur would just have an atomic number of 16 like normal.
8 0
3 years ago
Oh hi thanks for checking in I’m still a piece of garbage ^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^ - ^
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

True

and same lol

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The process of water migrating from areas of low electrolyte concentration to area of high electrolyte concentration is called —
    5·1 answer
  • What are five objects that are luminous
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a way that crystals can form in nature
    9·1 answer
  • Who can witness a lunar eclipse?
    8·2 answers
  • Which rock is an example of a clastic sedimentary rock?
    9·2 answers
  • For the chemical reaction:
    5·1 answer
  • Write short note on
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    12·2 answers
  • The term 10 points and brainlyess
    10·2 answers
  • Write a word equation for the following reactions. You must indicate whether each substance is a solid, liquid, gas, or solution
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!