1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
3 years ago
7

A fisherman notices that his boat is moving up and down periodically, owing to waves on the surface of the water. It takes 2.5 s

for the boat to travel from its highest point to its lowest, a total distance of 0.53 m. The fisherman sees that the wave crests are spaced 4.8 m apart. (a) How fast are the waves traveling? (b) What is the amplitude of each wave? (c) If the total vertical distance traveled by the boat were 0.30 m but the other data remained the same, how would the answers to parts (a) and (b) change?
Physics
1 answer:
gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
8 0

(a) 0.96 m/s

The period of the wave corresponds to the time taken for one complete oscillation of the boat, from the highest point to the highest point again. Since the time between the highest point and the lowest point is 2.5 s, the period is twice this time:

T=2\cdot 2.5 s=5.0 s

The frequency of the waves is the reciprocal of the period:

f=\frac{1}{T}=\frac{1}{5.0 s}=0.20 Hz

The wavelength instead is just the distance between two consecutive crests, so

\lambda=4.8 m

And the wave speed is given by:

v=\lambda f=(4.8 m)(0.20 Hz)=0.96 m/s

(b) 0.265 m

The total distance between the highest point of the wave and its lowest point is

d = 0.53 m

The amplitude is just the maximum displacement of the wave from the equilibrium position, so it is equal to half of this distance. So, the amplitude is

A=\frac{d}{2}=\frac{0.53 m}{2}=0.265 m

(c) Amplitude: 0.15 m, wave speed: same as before

In this case, the amplitude of the wave would be lower. In fact,

d = 0.30 m

So the amplitude would be

A=\frac{d}{2}=\frac{0.30 m}{2}=0.15 m

Instead, the wave speed would not change, since neither the frequency nor the wavelength of the wave have changed.

You might be interested in
Read the list of phrases from the article.
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

(D)

to establish an understanding of key concepts relating to population biology

Explanation:

Thats what I would go with but I didn't read the article so I don't know what context was used. Good luck! :)

8 0
3 years ago
A car is traveling north at 17.7 m/s . After 6 it’s velocity is 141 in the same direction. Find the magnitude and direction of t
Furkat [3]

By equation of motion we have   v = u + at

Where u = Initial velocity, v = final velocity, t = time taken and a = acceleration

Here v = 141 m/s, u = 17.7 m/s and t = 6 s

On substitution we will get

        141 = 17.7+ 6a

       So, a = (141-17.7)/6 = 20. 55 m/s^{2}

       Aceeleration = 20. 55 m/s^{2} along north direction.


3 0
3 years ago
What happens to a sheet of copper as kinetic energy of copper molecules decrease
liberstina [14]
First is melts then it expands next it gets cooler Finally it gains ener. Hope this helps you out.
8 0
3 years ago
Why does a satellite in a circular orbit travel at a constant speed? why does a satellite in a circular orbit travel at a consta
motikmotik
Why does a satellite in a circular orbit travel at a constant speed? why does a satellite in a circular orbit travel at a constant speed? there is a force acting opposite to the direction of the motion of the satellite. there is no component of force acting along the direction of motion of the satellite. the net force acting on the satellite is zero. the gravitational force acting on the satellite is balanced by the centrifugal force acting on the satellite?
..b.25
6 0
3 years ago
A student says that a speed of 50 m/s is faster than a speed of 140 km/h because the number is bigger. What would you say to the
ladessa [460]

The units are not consistent - 1 m/s is not the same as 1 km/h.

First thing to do would be to convert from one unit of speed to the other, say km/h to m/s. There are 1000 meters (m) for every kilometer (km) and 3600 seconds (s) for every hour (h), so

1\,\dfrac{\mathrm{km}}{\mathrm h}\cdot\dfrac{10^3\,\mathrm m}{\mathrm{km}}\cdot\dfrac{\mathrm h}{3600\,\mathrm s}\approx0.278\,\dfrac{\mathrm m}{\mathrm s}

So in fact 1 km/h is about 4 times slower than 1 m/s.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hat is most remarkable about the paintings of Pieter Breugel the Elder?
    12·1 answer
  • How to make green colour with two colours?
    10·2 answers
  • If we're interested in knowing the rate at which light energy is received by a unit of area on a particular surface, we're reall
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME 20 POINTS AND I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Billy picks up a 40 lb. dumbbell (mass = 18.14 kg). The center of his hand, where the dumbbell is held, is 56 cm (0.56 m) from t
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Do the particles in the medium material move in the same direction of the wave or at opposite direction to the wave? Explain
    9·1 answer
  • What does gravitational potential energy typically change into? Question 8 options: A-Electric energy B- Kinetic energy C- Radio
    13·2 answers
  • I’m in the middle of a test right now. If anybody knows this can they help
    5·1 answer
  • Which process would correctly calculate the frequency of a wave?
    5·2 answers
  • Students set up a controlled experiment (please help I am so tired and unable to function lol)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!