1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hitman42 [59]
3 years ago
9

If Star A is magnitude 1.0 and Star B is magnitude 9.6 , which is brighter and by what factor?

Physics
1 answer:
ludmilkaskok [199]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Star A is brighter than Star B by a factor of 2754.22

Explanation:

Lets assume,

the magnitude of star A = m₁ = 1

the magnitude of star B = m₂ = 9.6

the apparent brightness of star A and star B are b₁ and b₂ respectively

Then, relation between the difference of magnitudes and apparent brightness of two stars are related as give below: (m_{2} - m_{1}) = 2.5\log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2})

The current magnitude scale followed was formalized by Sir Norman Pogson in 1856. On this scale a magnitude 1 star is 2.512 times brighter than magnitude 2 star. A magnitude 2 star is 2.512 time brighter than a magnitude 3 star. That means a magnitude 1 star is (2.512x2.512) brighter than magnitude 3 bright star.

We need to find the factor by which star A is brighter than star B. Using the equation given above,

(9.6 - 1) = 2.5\log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2})

\frac{8.6}{2.5}  = \log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2})

\log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2}) = 3.44

Thus,

(b_{1}/b_{2}) = 2754.22

It means star A is 2754.22 time brighter than Star B.

You might be interested in
6. A car moving in a straight line at constant speed:
ddd [48]

Answer:

D. has no overall force acting on it.

Explanation:

Why?

Because in a straight line at the constant speed means the car moving in the same velocity, which is not acceleration neither deceleration, and it cannot be on a downhill slope. So the correct answer is

<h3>→ D. has no overall force acting on it.</h3>
8 0
3 years ago
A charge of -3.02 μC is fixed in place. From a horizontal distance of 0.0377 m, a particle of mass 9.43 x 10^-3 kg and charge -9
Andreyy89

Answer:

d = 0.0306 m

Explanation:

Here we know that for the given system of charge we have no loss of energy as there is no friction force on it

So we will have

U + K = constant

\frac{kq_1q_2}{r_1} + \frac{1}{2}mv_1^2 = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r_2} + \frac{1}{2}mv_2^2

now we know when particle will reach the closest distance then due to electrostatic repulsion the speed will become zero.

So we have

\frac{(9 \times 10^9)(3.02 \mu C)(9.78 \mu C)}{0.0377} + \frac{1}{2}(9.43 \times 10^{-3})(80.4)^2 = \frac{(9 \times 10^9)(3.02 \mu C)(9.78 \mu C)}{r} + 0

7.05 + 30.5 = \frac{0.266}{r}

r = 7.08 \times 10^{-3} m

so distance moved by the particle is given as

d = r_1 - r_2

d = 0.0377 - 0.00708

d = 0.0306 m

6 0
3 years ago
A person is standing on a raft; their
krok68 [10]

Answer:

The volume of water displaced by the raft is 0.233 m³

Explanation:

The question relates to Archimedes' principle which states that the buoyant force experienced by an object immersed in a fluid is equal to the weight of (the force of gravity on) the displaced fluid

The given parameters are;

The combined mass of the person and the raft, m = 233 kg

The liquid on which the raft is located = Water

The density of water, \rho _{water} = 1000 kg/m³

Weight = Mass, m × g

Where;

m = The mass of the object

g = The acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s²

Given that the raft is on the surface of the water (floating), the buoyant force is equal to the combined weight of the person and the raft = 233 kg

The combined weight of the person and the raft, W_{combined} = 233 kg × 9.8 m/s² = 2,283.4 N

Therefore;

The buoyant force = 2,283.4 N = The weight of the water displaced

The mass of the water displaced, m_{water}, = 2,283.4 N/(9.8 m/s²) = 233 kg

Density = Mass/Volume

The volume of water displaced by the raft = The mass of the water displaced/(The density of the water) = 233 kg/(1,000 kg/m³) = 0.233 m³.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best explains why sound waves cannot travel through space
Naddika [18.5K]
The vacuum of outer space has essentially zero air. Because sound is just vibrating air, space has no air to vibrate and therefore no sound. If you are sitting in a space ship and another space ship explodes, you would hear nothing. So, in order for sound to travel, there has to be something with molecules for it to travel through. On Earth, sound travels to your ears by vibrating air molecules. In deep space, the large empty areas between stars and planets, there are no molecules to vibrate. There is no sound there.
6 0
3 years ago
A passenger in the rear seat of a car moving at a steady speed is at rest relative to
Ber [7]
The person is at rest with respect to the car. So the best answer is:

c. the front seat of the car.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A cylinder with a movable piston contains 2.00 gg of helium, HeHe, at room temperature. More helium was added to the cylinder an
    5·2 answers
  • Rutherford proposed that
    13·1 answer
  • Plz plz answer quick...
    8·1 answer
  • How do the wavelength and frequency of red light compare to the wavelength and frequency of blue light?
    6·1 answer
  • Substitution solve for x &amp; y<br>-4x - 2y equals 14<br>-10x+7y=-25​
    9·1 answer
  • g Suppose that you charge a 3 F capacitor in a circuit containing eight 3.0 V batteries, so the final potential difference acros
    5·1 answer
  • Why there is tides in sea and ocean
    14·1 answer
  • When a cup is placed on a table, which force prevents the cup from falling to the ground?
    15·2 answers
  • Sleep is a difficult problem for dolphins because dolphins __________. A. need more sleep than their predators B. must be awake
    5·2 answers
  • A low-luminosity star has a small and narrow ________, whereas a high-luminosity star has a large and wide one.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!