Answer:
Explanation:
A and B are in series , Total resistance = Ra + Rb
This resistance is in parallel with single resistor C
Equivalent resistance Re = Rc x ( Ra + Rb ) / [Rc + ( Ra + Rb )]
Now this combination is in series in single resistance D .
Total resistance = Rd + Re
= Rd + { Rc x ( Ra + Rb ) / [Rc + ( Ra + Rb )] }
(a) The net flux through the coil is zero.
In fact, the magnetic field generated by the wire forms concentric circles around the wire. The wire is placed along the diameter of the coil, so we can imagine as it divides the coil into two emisphere. Therefore, the magnetic field of the wire is perpendicular to the plane of the coil, but the direction of the field is opposite in the two emispheres. Since the two emispheres have same area, then the magnetic fluxes in the two emispheres are equal but opposite in sign, and so they cancel out when summing them together to find the net flux.
(b) If the wire passes through the center of the coil but it is perpendicular to the plane of the wire, the net flux through the coil is still zero.
In fact, the magnetic field generated by the wire forms concentric lines around the wire, so it is parallel to the plane of the coil. But the flux is equal to
where
is the angle between the direction of the magnetic field and the perpendicular to the plane of the coil, so in this case
and so the cosine is zero, therefore the net flux is zero.
Answer:
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = 425 W/m²
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = 75.905 W/m²
Explanation:
Given:
Unpolarized light of intensity (I₀) = 950 W/m²
θ = 65°
Find:
a. Intensity of the light (first polarizer)
b. Intensity of the light (second polarizer)
Computation:
a. Intensity of the light (first polarizer)
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = I₀ / 2
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = 950 / 2
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = 425 W/m²
b. Intensity of the light (second polarizer)
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = (I₁)cos²θ
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = (425)(0.1786)
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = 75.905 W/m²
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Becuase the average amu of 40 is represented
The resistance of a wire is directly proportional to the length of the wire. That is the longer the length of the wire, the higher the resistance and the shorter the length of the wire, the smaller the resistance.