Complete Question
A student is extracting caffeine from water with dichloromethane. The K value is 4.6. If the student starts with a total of 40 mg of caffeine in 2 mL of water and extracts once with 6 mL of dichloromethane
The experiment above is repeated, but instead of extracting once with 6 mL the extraction is done three times with 2 mL of dichloromethane each time. How much caffeine will be in each dichloromethane extract?
Answer:
The mass of caffeine extracted is 
Explanation:
From the question above we are told that
The K value is 
The mass of the caffeine is 
The volume of water is 
The volume of caffeine is 
The number of times the extraction was done is n = 3
Generally the mass of caffeine that will be extracted is
![P = m * [\frac{V}{K * v_c + V} ]^3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%20%3D%20%20m%20%20%2A%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7BV%7D%7BK%20%2A%20%20v_c%20%2B%20V%7D%20%5D%5E3)
substituting values
![P = 40 * [\frac{2}{4.6 * 2 + 2} ]^3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%20%3D%20%2040%20%20%20%2A%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B4.6%20%2A%20%202%20%2B%202%7D%20%5D%5E3)

I have the same question and cant still answer it so I need the answers
Answer:
HCl(aq) + KOH(aq) ⇒ KCl(aq) + H₂O(l)
Explanation:
Hydrochloric acid is an acid because it releases H⁺ in an aqueous solution.
Potassium hydroxide is a base because it releases OH⁻ in an aqueous solution.
When an acid reacts with a base they form a salt and water. This is a neutralization reaction. The neutralization reaction between hydrochloric acid and potassium hydroxide is:
HCl(aq) + KOH(aq) ⇒ KCl(aq) + H₂O(l)
Answer:
They're different - heat and thermal energy. ... The heat, in turn, speeds up the molecules within the pot and the water. If you place a thermometer in the water, as the water heats up, you can watch the temperature rise. Again, an increase in internal energy will result in an increase in temperature.
Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.