1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Crazy boy [7]
3 years ago
11

A ball is kicked from the top of a building with a velocity of 50 m/s and lands 165 m away from the base of the building.

Physics
1 answer:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

3.1 s

Explanation:

we can assume that this motion has a horizontal projectile motion.

projectile motion happens when  an object is subjected to only gravity. Gravity acts to influence the vertical motion of the projectile, it makes a  vertical acceleration.  

The horizontal motion of the projectile is the result of the constant velocity of the object.We assume no acceleration in the horizontal direction.  

applying motion equations

where

s - distance

u - initial velocity

a-acceleration

t - time

s = ut + (1/2)at²

→ 165 = 50t + 0 (as no acceleration is in horizontal direction)

t = 3.1 s

You might be interested in
Is anyone bored? could they do 37 pages of notes for my AP world history
sashaice [31]
You finna have to pay me lol what it look like though and i’ll see if it’s worth it make some
6 0
3 years ago
If the resultant of two velocity vectors of equal magnitude is also of the same magnitude, then which statement must be correct?
Tamiku [17]

The correct option is C) The angle between the vectors is 120°.

Why?

We can solve the problem and find the correct option using the Law of Cosine.

Let A and B, the given two sides and R the resultant (sum),

Then,

R=A=B

So, using the law of cosines, we have:

R^{2}=A^{2}+B^{2}+2ABCos(\alpha)\\ \\A^{2}=A^{2}+A^{2}+2*A*A*Cos(\alpha)\\\\0=A^{2}+2*A^{2}*Cos(\alpha)\\\\Cos(\alpha)=-\frac{A^{2}}{2*A^{2}}=-\frac{1}{2}\\\\\alpha =Cos(-\frac{1}{2})^{-1}=120\°

Hence, we have that the angle between the vectors is 120°. The correct option is C) The angle between the vectors is 120°

Have a nice day!

4 0
3 years ago
A 5 kg pineapple is hanging completely still in mid air on a string and suddenly explodes
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

Explanation:

Conservation of momentum

Initial momentum is zero

3(15) + 2(v) = 0

v = - 22.5 m/s

v = 22.5 m/s downward

3 0
3 years ago
An infinite line of charge with linear density λ1 = 8.2 μC/m is positioned along the axis of a thick insulating shell of inner r
bixtya [17]

1) Linear charge density of the shell:  -2.6\mu C/m

2)  x-component of the electric field at r = 8.7 cm: 1.16\cdot 10^6 N/C outward

3)  y-component of the electric field at r =8.7 cm: 0

4)  x-component of the electric field at r = 1.15 cm: 1.28\cdot 10^7 N/C outward

5) y-component of the electric field at r = 1.15 cm: 0

Explanation:

1)

The linear charge density of the cylindrical insulating shell can be found  by using

\lambda_2 = \rho A

where

\rho = -567\mu C/m^3 is charge volumetric density

A is the area of the cylindrical shell, which can be written as

A=\pi(b^2-a^2)

where

b=4.7 cm=0.047 m is the outer radius

a=2.7 cm=0.027 m is the inner radius

Therefore, we have :

\lambda_2=\rho \pi (b^2-a^2)=(-567)\pi(0.047^2-0.027^2)=-2.6\mu C/m

 

2)

Here we want to find the x-component of the electric field at a point at a distance of 8.7 cm from the central axis.

The electric field outside the shell is the superposition of the fields produced by the line of charge and the field produced by the shell:

E=E_1+E_2

where:

E_1=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi r \epsilon_0}

where

\lambda_1=8.2\mu C/m = 8.2\cdot 10^{-6} C/m is the linear charge density of the wire

r = 8.7 cm = 0.087 m is the distance from the axis

And this field points radially outward, since the charge is positive .

And

E_2=\frac{\lambda_2}{2\pi r \epsilon_0}

where

\lambda_2=-2.6\mu C/m = -2.6\cdot 10^{-6} C/m

And this field points radially inward, because the charge is negative.

Therefore, the net field is

E=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi \epsilon_0 r}+\frac{\lambda_2}{2\pi \epsilon_0r}=\frac{1}{2\pi \epsilon_0 r}(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2)=\frac{1}{2\pi (8.85\cdot 10^{-12})(0.087)}(8.2\cdot 10^{-6}-2.6\cdot 10^{-6})=1.16\cdot 10^6 N/C

in the outward direction.

3)

To find the net electric field along the y-direction, we have to sum the y-component of the electric field of the wire and of the shell.

However, we notice that since the wire is infinite, for the element of electric field dE_y produced by a certain amount of charge dq along the wire there exist always another piece of charge dq on the opposite side of the wire that produce an element of electric field -dE_y, equal and opposite to dE_y.

Therefore, this means that the net field produced by the wire along the y-direction is zero at any point.

We can apply the same argument to the cylindrical shell (which is also infinite), and therefore we find that also the field generated by the cylindrical shell has no component along the y-direction. Therefore,

E_y=0

4)

Here we want to find the x-component of the electric field at a point at

r = 1.15 cm

from the central axis.

We notice that in this case, the cylindrical shell does not contribute to the electric field at r = 1.15 cm, because the inner radius of the shell is at 2.7 cm from the axis.

Therefore, the electric field at r = 1.15 cm is only given by the electric field produced by the infinite wire:

E=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi \epsilon_0 r}

where:

\lambda_1=8.2\mu C/m = 8.2\cdot 10^{-6} C/m is the linear charge density of the wire

r = 1.15 cm = 0.0115 m is the distance from the axis

This field points radially outward, since the charge is positive . Therefore,

E=\frac{8.2\cdot 10^{-6}}{2\pi (8.85\cdot 10^{-12})(0.0115)}=1.28\cdot 10^7 N/C

5)

For this last part we can use the same argument used in part 4): since the wire is infinite, for the element of electric field dE_y produced by a certain amount of charge dq along the wire there exist always another piece of charge dq on the opposite side of the wire that produce an element of electric field -dE_y, equal and opposite to dE_y.

Therefore, the y-component of the electric field is zero.

Learn more about electric field:

brainly.com/question/8960054

brainly.com/question/4273177

#LearnwithBrainly

4 0
3 years ago
Does volume affect potential energy
Andrej [43]

Answer:

No, the volume don't affect the potential energy.

Explanation:

The volume does not affect the potential energy, as this energy depends on the mass and elevation of the body relative to the reference point. This analysis can be easily seen in the equation expressing potential energy

E_{p} =m*g*h\\where:\\m=mass[kg]\\g=gravity[m/^2]\\h=elevation[m]

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Should a flat grassland or a hillside have deeper soil? Explain your answer.
    9·1 answer
  • Which factor affects elastic potential energy but not gravitational potential energy?
    14·2 answers
  • If alex has mass of 60 kg on Earth, what is his mass on the moon?
    8·1 answer
  • Waves keep their what even when they bounce of something
    8·1 answer
  • Holes are being steadily injected into a region of n-type silicon (connected to other devices, the details of which are not impo
    10·1 answer
  • In longitudinal waves the places where the coils are bunched together are called *
    10·1 answer
  • HEELLPPPPPpppppppppppppppp
    9·1 answer
  • When we look up in the sky the Sun appears about as big as the moon; however, we know that the Sun is much further away. Given t
    7·1 answer
  • A skateboarder, starting from the top of a ramp 4,5 m above the ground, skates down the ramp. The mass of the skateboarder and h
    15·2 answers
  • A piece of steel expands 10 cm when ur is heated from 20 to 50 degrees Celsius. How much would it expand if it was heated from 2
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!