Answer:
True The grid with more slits gives more angle separation increases
True. The grating with 10 slits produces better-defined (narrower) peaks
Explanation:
Such a system can be seen as a diffraction network in this case with different number of lines per unit length, the expression for the constructive interference of a diffraction network is
d sin θ = m λ
where d is the distance between slits or lines, m the order of diffraction and λ the wavelength.
For network with 5 slits
d = 1/5 = 0.2
For the network with 10 slits
d = 1/10 = 0.1
let's calculate the separation (teat) for each one
θ = sin⁻¹ (m λ / d)
for 5 slits
θ₅ = sin⁻¹ (m λ 5)
for 10 slits
θ₁₀ = sin⁻¹ (m λ 10)
we can appreciate that for more slits the angle increases
the intensity of a series of slits is
I = I₀ sin²2 (N d/2) / sin² d/2)
when there are more slits (N) the peaks have greater intensity and are more acute (half width decreases)
let's analyze the claims
False
True The grid with more slits gives more angle separation increases
False
True The expression for the intensity of the diffraction peaks the intensity of the peaks increases with the number of slits as well as their spectral width decreases
False
There is not enough information here.
The study of sound is called sonics and the study of sound waves are acoustics
Answer:
1.
2.
3.The results from part 1 and 2 agree when r = R.
Explanation:
The volume charge density is given as
We will investigate this question in two parts. First r < R, then r > R. We will show that at r = R, the solutions to both parts are equal to each other.
1. Since the cylinder is very long, Gauss’ Law can be applied.
The enclosed charge can be found by integrating the volume charge density over the inner cylinder enclosed by the imaginary Gaussian surface with radius ‘r’. The integration of E-field in the left-hand side of the Gauss’ Law is not needed, since E is constant at the chosen imaginary Gaussian surface, and the area integral is
where ‘h’ is the length of the imaginary Gaussian surface.
2. For r> R, the total charge of the enclosed cylinder is equal to the total charge of the cylinder. So,
3. At the boundary where r = R:
As can be seen from above, two E-field values are equal as predicted.