Answer: Part(a)=0.041 secs, Part(b)=0.041 secs
Explanation: Firstly we assume that only the gravitational acceleration is acting on the basket ball player i.e. there is no air friction
now we know that
a=-9.81 m/s^2 ( negative because it is pulling the player downwards)
we also know that
s=76 cm= 0.76 m ( maximum s)
using kinetic equation
where v is final velocity which is zero at max height and u is it initial
hence
now we can find time in the 15 cm ascent
using quadratic formula
t=0.0409 sec
the answer for the part b will be the same
To find the answer for the part b we can find the velocity at 15 cm height similarly using
where s=0.76-0.15
as the player has traveled the above distance to reach 15cm to the bottom
when the player reaches the bottom it has the same velocity with which it started which is 3.861
hence the time required to reach the bottom 15cm is
t=0.0409
Answer:
a) 
b) 
c) 
d) 
or 18.3 cm
Explanation:
For this case we have the following system with the forces on the figure attached.
We know that the spring compresses a total distance of x=0.10 m
Part a
The gravitational force is defined as mg so on this case the work donde by the gravity is:
Part b
For this case first we can convert the spring constant to N/m like this:
And the work donde by the spring on this case is given by:
Part c
We can assume that the initial velocity for the block is Vi and is at rest from the end of the movement. If we use balance of energy we got:
And if we solve for the initial velocity we got:
Part d
Let d1 represent the new maximum distance, in order to find it we know that :
And replacing we got:
And we can put the terms like this:
If we multiply all the equation by 2 we got:
Now we can replace the values and we got:
And solving the quadratic equation we got that the solution for or 18.3 cm because the negative solution not make sense.
Raditionally mangrove forests<span> were viewed as </span>wastelands and unhealthy environments<span>. People therefore reasoned that </span>their<span> removal would improve the health ...</span>
Answer:
However, the disadvantages are:
1. Many atimes for some motion prolems, free-body diagrams has to be drawn many times so to have enough equations to solve for the unknowns. This is not the same with energy conservation principles.
2. In situations where we need to find the internal forces acting on an object, we can't truly solve such problems using free-body diagram as it captures external forces. This is not the same with energy conservation principles.
Explanation:
Often times the ideal method to use in solving motion problem related questions are mostly debated.
Energy conservation principles applies to isolated systems are useful when object changes their positions in moving upward or downward converts its potential energy due to gravity for kinetic energy, or the other way round. When energy in a system or motion remains constant that is energy is neither created nor destroyed, it can therefore be easier to calculate other unknown paramters like in the motion problem velocity, distance bearing it in mind that energy can only change from one type to another.
On the other hand, free body diagram which is a visual representation of all the forces acting on an object including their directions has so many advantages in solving motion related problems which include finding relationship between force and motion in identifying the force acting on a body.
Answer:
1.72 x 10³ N.
Explanation:
When a charge is split equally and placed at a certain distance , maximum electrostatic force is possible.
So the charges will be each equal to
31/2 = 15.5 x 10⁻⁶ C
F = K Q q / r²
= 
= 1.72 x 10³ N.
