Ask question

Ask question

All categories

bogdanovich [222]

3 years ago

11

Suppose a new liquid were discovered that is identical to water in every way except that it has a lower latent heat of fusion. W

ould it take a longer or shorter time to make ice out of this liquid in your freezer? Why?

2 answers:

Sati [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Shorter

It would take shorter to freeze the new liquid

Explanation:

Let the latent heat of fusion of the new liquid be Y and

Let the latent heat of fusion of water be Z

Where Z = 2×Y for example

Therefore, the heat lost to make ice from a given mass of water is given by;

Heat loss = Mass of water, m × ΔH(latent) Water

= m × Z

The heat lost to make ice from equal mass of the new liquid is

= m × Y = m × Z/2 = 0.5× m×Z

Therefore the heat required to be removed to make an equal mass of ice of the new liquid is half that of the heat removed to make an equal mass of ice.

Where the rate of heat extraction is A watts of A J/s we have;

Time required to freeze new liquid = 0.5 × time required to freeze water.

Hence it would take shorter to freeze the new liquid.

faltersainse [42]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

It would take less time, because having a lower temperature of latent heat means that at a lower temperature it merges, therefore the closer it will be to the temperature of solification which is 0 degrees Celsius or Celsius ... It is then that it would solidify in less time than water

Explanation:

By acting and having all the same properties as water except for latent heat, it considers that the solidification temperature is 0 degrees Celsius like water.

You might be interested in

How many kilojoules of energy would be required to heat a 225g block of aluminum from 23.0 C to 73.5 C?

gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

$\boxed {\boxed {\sf 10.2 \ kJ}}$

Explanation:

We are asked to find how many kilojoules of energy would be required to heat a block of aluminum.

We will use the following formula to calculate heat energy.

$q=mc \Delta T$

The mass (m) of the aluminum block is 225 grams and the specific heat (c) is 0.897 Joules per gram degree Celsius. The change in temperature (ΔT) is the difference between the final temperature and the initial temperature.

ΔT = final temperature - inital temperature

The aluminum block was heated from 23.0 °C to 73.5 °C.

ΔT= 73.5 °C - 23.0 °C = 50.5 °C

Now we know all three variables and can substitute them into the formula.

m= 225 g
c= 0.897 J/g° C
ΔT= 50.5 °C

$q= (225 \ g )(0.897 \ J/g \textdegree C)(50.5 \textdegree C)$

Multiply the first two numbers. The units of grams cancel.

$q= (225 \ g * 0.897 \ J/g \textdegree C)(50.5 \textdegree C)$

$q= (225 * 0.897 \ J / \textdegree C)(50.5 \textdegree C)$

$q= (201.825\ J / \textdegree C)(50.5 \textdegree C)$

Multiply again. This time, the units of degrees Celsius cancel.

$q= 201.825 \ J * 50.5$

$q= 10192.1625 \ J$

The answer asks for the energy in kilojoules, so we must convert our answer. Remember that 1 kilojoule contains 1000 joules.

$\frac { 1 \ kJ}{ 1000 \ J}$

Multiply by the answer we found in Joules.

$10192.1625 \ J * \frac{ 1 \ kJ}{ 1000 \ J}$

$10192.1625 * \frac{ 1 \ kJ}{ 1000 }$

$\frac {10192. 1625}{1000} \ kJ$

$10.1921625 \ kJ$

The original values of mass, temperature, and specific heat all have 3 significant figures, so our answer must have the same. For the number we found, that is the tneths place. The 9 in the hundredth place tells us to round the 1 up to a 2.

$10.2 \ kJ$

Approximately <u>10.2 kilojoules</u> of energy would be required.

3 0

3 years ago

Help please and thanks

Likurg_2 [28]

The first one is 2
The second is 1
The third is 6
And the fourth is 3

4 0

3 years ago

51. The radius of gold is 144 pm and the density is 19.32 g/cm3. Does elemental gold have a face-centered cubic structure or a b

Serjik [45]

Answer:

Elemental gold to have a Face-centered cubic structure.

Explanation:

From the information given:

Radius of gold = 144 pm

Its density = 19.32 g/cm³

Assuming the structure is a face-centered cubic structure, we can determine the density of the crystal by using the following:

$a = \sqrt{8} r$

$a = \sqrt{8} \times 144 pm$

a = 407 pm

In a unit cell, Volume (V) = a³

V = (407 pm)³

V = 6.74 × 10⁷ pm³

V = 6.74 × 10⁻²³ cm³

Recall that:

Net no. of an atom in an FCC unit cell = 4

Thus;

$density = \dfrac{mass}{volume}$

$density = \dfrac{ 4 \ atm ( 196.97 \ g/mol) (\dfrac{1 \ mol }{6.022 \times 10^{23} \ atoms})}{6.74 \times 10^{-23} \ cm^3}$

density d = 19.41 g/cm³

Similarly; For a body-centered cubic structure

$r = \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}a$

where;

r = 144

$144 = \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}a$

$a = \dfrac{144 \times 4}{\sqrt{3}}$

a = 332.56 pm

In a unit cell, Volume V = a³

V = (332.56 pm)³

V = 3.68 × 10⁷ pm³

V 3.68 × 10⁻²³ cm³

Recall that:

Net no. of atoms in BCC cell = 2

∴

$density = \dfrac{mass}{volume}$

$density = \dfrac{ 2 \ atm ( 196.97 \ g/mol) (\dfrac{1 \ mol }{6.022 \times 10^{23} \ atoms})}{3.68 \times 10^{-23} \ cm^3}$

density =17.78 g/cm³

From the two calculate densities, we will realize that the density in the face-centered cubic structure is closer to the given density.

This makes the elemental gold to have a Face-centered cubic structure.

3 0

3 years ago

2) Examine the molecules below.<br> Circle the molecules that can also be classified as compounds.

sergejj [24]

Answer:

3rd

Explanation:

its the way they look

4 0

2 years ago

damaskus [11]

Mostly in my opinion I think it’s the secound one

8 0

3 years ago