1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vsevolod [243]
4 years ago
10

explain the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the example (the pic) while using the words mechanical energy a

nd conservation of energy.
Physics
1 answer:
BigorU [14]4 years ago
5 0
PE is the energy acquired by a body due to its height ! While KE is the energy acquired by the body due to its motion !

KE+PE = mechanical energy and thus mechanical energy is always conserved due to the conservation of energy which states that energy is neither created nor destroyed but only transformed !
You might be interested in
A tow rope pulls a 1450 kg truck, giving it an acceleration 1.25 m/s^2. What force does the rope exert?
bagirrra123 [75]

force=mass × acceleration

mass=force ÷ acceleration

acceleration=force ÷ mass

4 0
3 years ago
HELP!! A car driving down a hill contains many types of energy. DESCRIBE at least 3 types of energy the car has.
Serhud [2]

1. Kinetic

2. Chemical

3. Potential

7 0
4 years ago
What is the component of d1 along the direction of d2?
aniked [119]
I don't know lol hahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
8 0
3 years ago
April stands on a flat surface . If she has a mass of 72 what is the nirmal force acting on her
gayaneshka [121]

The normal force acting on April as she stands on a flat surface is 705.6 N.

Normal force of the girl

Fₙ = mg

where;

  • Fₙ is the normal force of the girl
  • m is mass of the girl
  • g is acceleration due to gravity

Fₙ = 72 x 9.8

Fₙ = 705.6 N

Thus, the normal force acting on April as she stands on a flat surface is 705.6 N.

Learn more about normal force here: brainly.com/question/14486416

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Date
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Because Kinetic Energy(KE) is not the same as Momentum(P)

Kinetic Energy is a scalar(has magnitude only). For a body of mass M, velocity V:

KE = 0.5MV^2

The units of KE: Joules.

Energy is the ability to do work.

Momentum is not a form of energy.

Momentum is a vector(has magnitude and direction).

P = MV

Units of momentum: kg m/s

If you have rifles of mass 2, 4, 8, 16 kg, using the same cartridge, with the same load, barrel length(remember momentum of projectile is proportional to velocity), they all have the same recoil momentum.

But the kinetic energy of recoil would be inversely proportional to the mass of the gun.

Thus the 2kg gun(possible even in large powerful calibers due to modern materials like titanium etc), would have 8 times the recoil ENERGY of the 16kg gun.

A lot of confusion exists in America because of retention of old units, namely Foot Pounds(force) for KE, and Pounds(mass) Feet Per Second for Momentum(P). Because of the more awkward momentum units, a lot of old books had a bad habit of calling the momentum units Pounds Feet, leaving out the rest. Naturally this created confusion with Foot Pounds. Multiplication being commutative and all that:).

Remember that the momentum of the rifles is the same. But the ones with the highest recoil energy hurt the most.

Speaking of hurt:

If momentum killed, then consider two dinosaur killer asteroids with the same masses and velocities, striking vertically at the same time antipodal points on the Earth’s surface. Total momentum delivered would be Zero. That would not make us safe at all:)

Similarly, being shot simultaneously at close range from opposite sides with a 5 round burst from each from two M4 assault rifles(by definition must be able to fire full auto) delivered in 0.3 seconds, would deliver zero momentum. But not zero harm.

Also, the recoil momentum of any firearm is equal to the mass of projectile x velocity + mass of propellant x exit velocity of propellant. This is obviously greater, often much greater, depending on range, than the striking momentum of the projectile at the target.

The recoil kinetic energy is vastly less than the kinetic energy of the bullet/projectile. Neglecting propellant contribution:

recoil Momentum = bullet momentum

BUT:

recoil KE/bullet KE = projectile mass/gun mass

This is a very small fraction.

If we consider the M4 carried by American military:

M855(SS109 equivalent) 5.56 bullet of mass 0.004kg(62 grains)is fired from M4 assault rifle of mass, with optic and full mag 4kg, a thousand times as much!

Even allowing for the 0.0015kg powder charge, and the higher velocity of the powder(approx 1400=1500 m/s vs approx 900 m/s muzzle velocity of the bullet), the recoil energy is hundreds of times less than the muzzle energy of the bullet.

That’s why you want to be behind the gun, and not in front.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please...physics rotation questions
    9·1 answer
  • Neglecting air resistance, what maximum height will be reached by an arrow launched straight upward with an initial speed of 35
    12·1 answer
  • What is the difference between alternating current and direct current?
    7·2 answers
  • A person notices a mild shock if the current along a path through the thumb and index finger exceeds 77 μA. Compare the maximum
    15·1 answer
  • A nonuniform, but spherically symmetric, distribution of charge has a charge density ρ(r) given as follows:
    13·1 answer
  • A 40kg rock falls off a cliff that is 50 meters high. How fast is the speed of the rock when it hits the ground.
    5·2 answers
  • A spring is stretched from x=0 to x=d, where x=0 is the equilibrium position of the spring. It is then compressed from x=0 to x=
    12·1 answer
  • A uniform cylindrical grinding wheel of mass 50.0 kg and diameter 1.0 m is turned on by an electric motor. The friction in the b
    12·1 answer
  • what is the purpose of a domain in science? do not copy any thing of the internet and they are not the right answer. I am learni
    8·1 answer
  • A 3.42 kg steel ball strikes a massive wall at 14.3 m/s at an angle of α = 61.5° with respect to the plane of the wall. It bounc
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!