All categories

2 years ago

Which tower is more likely to fall?

Physics

2 answers:

shepuryov [24]2 years ago

6 0

I say B. only because its smaller in width and it has a better chance of falling

Tasya [4]2 years ago

4 0

If there is no difference in angles but one has more width - this one is more likely to fall.

<span>In physics, we use term "center of mass" (geometrical point). </span>
<span>The displacement of the center of mass from vertical line is higher => higher magnitude of net force => higher chance to fall.
</span>
I would say A :)

You might be interested in

Heights of men on a baseball team have a bell-shaped distribution with a mean of 166 cm 166 cm and a standard deviation of 5 cm

kaheart [24]

Answer:

95 %

99.7 %

Explanation:

$\mu$ = 166 cm = Mean

$\sigma$ = 5 cm = Standard deviation

a) 156 cm and 176 cm

$166-5\times 2=156$

$166+5\times 2=176$

From the empirical rule 95% of all values are within 2 standard deviation of the mean, so about 95% of men are between 156 cm and 176 cm.

b) 151 cm and 181 cm

$166-5\times 3 =151$

$166+5\times 3=181$

The empirical rule tells us that about 99.7% of all values are within 3 standard deviations of the mean, so about 99.7% of men are between 151 cm and 181 cm.

3 0

2 years ago

Two identical twins hold on to a rope, one at each end, on a smooth, frictionless ice surface. They skate in a circle about the

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

Part a)

$L = 2683.2 kg m^2/s$

Part b)

$v' = 8.60 m/s$

Part c)

$W = 4326.7 J$

Explanation:

Part a)

As we know that there is no external torque on the system of two twins

so here we will use

$L = mv r + mvr$

$L = 2(78 \times 4.30 \times 4)$

$L = 2683.2 kg m^2/s$

Part b)

Since angular momentum is conserved here as there is no external torque

so we will have

$2(m v r) = 2( m v' \frac{r}{2})$

$v' = 2v$

$v' = 8.60 m/s$

Part c)

Work done by both of them = change in kinetic energy

so we have

$W = 2(\frac{1}{2}mv'^2 - \frac{1}{2}mv^2)$

$W = m(v'^2 - v^2)$

$W = 78(8.60^2 - 4.3^2)$

$W = 4326.7 J$

5 0

2 years ago

Sayid made a chart listing data of two colliding objects. A 5-column table titled Collision: Two Objects Stick Together with 2 r

Alborosie

Answer:

6 m/s is the missing final velocity

Explanation:

From the data table we extract that there were two objects (X and Y) that underwent an inelastic collision, moving together after the collision as a new object with mass equal the addition of the two original masses, and a new velocity which is the unknown in the problem).

Object X had a mass of 300 kg, while object Y had a mass of 100 kg.

Object's X initial velocity was positive (let's imagine it on a horizontal axis pointing to the right) of 10 m/s. Object Y had a negative velocity (imagine it as pointing to the left on the horizontal axis) of -6 m/s.

We can solve for the unknown, using conservation of momentum in the collision: Initial total momentum = Final total momentum (where momentum is defined as the product of the mass of the object times its velocity.

In numbers, and calling $P_{xi}$ the initial momentum of object X and $P_{yi}$ the initial momentum of object Y, we can derive the total initial momentum of the system: $P_{total}_i=P_{xi}+P_{yi}= 300*10 \frac{kg*m}{s} -100*6\frac{kg*m}{s} =\\=(3000-600 )\frac{kg*m}{s} =2400 \frac{kg*m}{s}$

Since in the collision there is conservation of the total momentum, this initial quantity should equal the quantity for the final mometum of the stack together system (that has a total mass of 400 kg):

Final momentum of the system: $M * v_f=400kg * v_f$

We then set the equality of the momenta (total initial equals final) and proceed to solve the equation for the unknown(final velocity of the system):

$2400 \frac{kg*m}{s} =400kg*v_f\\\frac{2400}{400} \frac{m}{s} =v_f\\v_f=6 \frac{m}{s}$

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Eddie set up a science experiment with plants. He bought three small tomato plants, all about the same size and height, and set

Elza [17]

Answer:

The frequency of watering

Explanation:

The manipulated variable in this case is the frequency of adding water to the experimental plants.

While the first plant can be said to have a watering frequency of a day, the second had a watering frequency of 2 days while the third plant had a watering frequency of 3 days.

The experiment must have been set up to determine the effects of frequency of watering on the growth of tomato plants.

8 0

3 years ago

Is a personal trainer considered a doctor?

Temka [501]

No, personal trainers and doctors have very different careers. Though they both do well for the body and health.

4 0

2 years ago