I believe all of these would be known as specific phobias.
Answer:
a)
1.35 kg
b)
2.67 ms⁻¹
Explanation:
a)
= mass of first body = 2.7 kg
= mass of second body = ?
= initial velocity of the first body before collision = 
= initial velocity of the second body before collision = 0 m/s
= final velocity of the first body after collision =
using conservation of momentum equation
Using conservation of kinetic energy
b)
= mass of first body = 2.7 kg
= mass of second body = 1.35 kg
= initial velocity of the first body before collision = 4 ms⁻¹
= initial velocity of the second body before collision = 0 m/s
Speed of the center of mass of two-body system is given as
ms⁻¹
Answer:
69.69 g
Explanation:
Evaporation of water will take out latent heat of vaporization. Let the mass of water be m and latent heat of vaporization of water be 2260000 J per kg
Heat taken up by evaporating water
= 2260000 x m J
Heat lost by body
= mass x specific heat of body x drop in temperature
60 x 3500 x .750 ( specific heat of human body is 3.5 kJ/kg.k)
= 157500 J
Heat loss = heat gain
2260000 m= 157500
m = .06969 kg
= 69.69 g
Verrrrry interesting !
If the moon were replaced by something with a vastly greater mass
but at the same distance, then ...
-- The period of its revolution around the Earth would be much shorter.
That is, it would orbit the Earth in much less than 27.3 days. We might
see it go through a complete set of phases in 2 weeks, or even 1 week.
-- The ocean tides would be much greater. Low tides would be
much lower, and high tides would be much higher.
-- Sadly, the land tides, and the forces on the Earth's internal structure,
would also be much greater. That means great increases in earthquake
and volcanic activity.
-- The Earth and moon both revolve around their common center of
mass. Under the current arrangement ... with the Earth having 80 times
the mass of the Moon ... that point is inside the Earth, and it looks a lot
like the Moon is orbiting a stationary Earth.
When the new body arrives to replace the lightweight Moon, that point
will be a lot closer to the new companion ... maybe even inside it.
Then, it will look a lot like the monster is the stationary one, and the
Earth is orbiting it.
I actually don't believe that we would SEE that change, or feel it.
The discovery of ribozymes provide evidence that life on the early earth may have been based on RNA world hypothesis.
<h3>Origins of Life and the RNA World</h3>
We must think about how these mechanisms developed during evolution in order to completely comprehend the processes taking place in modern living cells.
The production of genetic information, which today requires incredibly complicated machinery and travels from DNA to protein via an intermediary called RNA, is the most fundamental of all such issues.
<h3>How did this equipment come to be? </h3>
One theory holds that there was an RNA world on Earth before contemporary cells emerged. This is the hypothesis.
RNA was a genetic information repository and a catalyst for chemical reactions in the earliest cells.
Proteins took over as the main catalytic and structural component of cells considerably earlier in the evolutionary process than DNA, which didn’t become the major genetic component until much later. If this hypothesis is correct, the departure from the RNA world was never truly complete.
To know more about RNA World visit:
brainly.com/question/25979866
#SPJ4
