All categories

2 years ago

Please help me with this i am so!! stuck

2 answers:

6 0

If small objects can be anything, basically anything goes! People could go, ants could go, they are really tiny, use your imagination, and you could think of many possibilities!

Alex17521 [72]2 years ago

4 0

The question seems kind of squishy.

The smallest objects are also the most numerous in the
whole universe. Those are the Hydrogen atoms.

The most numerous objects that are big enough for us to see
are the stars, but I'm not going to say that those are the answer.
Stick with me here, and follow my reasoning.

The Kepler space telescope is discovering so many planets
orbiting other stars outside our solar system, that it's beginning
to look like MOST stars have planets.

Stars are bigger. Planets are smaller. If most stars have planets,
then the most numerous objects that compose much of the universe
are the planets ! (plus maybe their moons too)

Does this make any sense to you ?

Now I have to ask YOU a question:
Are there any choices for answers to this question
that you're not telling us about ?

You might be interested in

Consider a traveling wave described by the formula

Harrizon [31]

Answer:

The wave is traveling in the +x direction.

Explanation:

The equation of a wave is given by the formula as :

$y(x,t)=A\ sin(kx-\omega t)$

Here,

A is the amplitude of wave

$(kx-\omega t)$ is the phase of wave

$\omega$ is the angular frequency of the wave

We need to find the correct statement out of given options. The given equation can be rewritten as :

$y(x,t)=A\ sin(\omega t-kx)$

Here, the propagation constant is negative. So, the wave is moving in +x direction. Hence, the correct option is (a).

4 0

3 years ago

Why are Watson’s experiments considered controversial?

iris [78.8K]

D, it is considered unethical today

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement is true?

miv72 [106K]

B might be the correct answer

8 0

2 years ago

Se um corpo 1 está em movimento em relação a um corpo 2, e se o corpo 2 está em repouso em relação a um corpo 3, pode-se afirmar

stealth61 [152]

Yo habla ingles no espanol

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

yvonne van gennip of the netherlands ice skated 10.0 km with an average speed of 10.8 m/s. suppose vang ennip crosses the finish

Sophie [7]

By conservation of momentum, we will find that the mass is 4.97 kg.

So in the original system, we have two objects, the bouquet of flowers of mass M that is not moving and Yvonne, which has a mass of 63 kg and a speed of 10.8 m/s.

Then the total momentum of this system is:

P = (63kg)*(10.8m/s) + M*(0 m/s) = 680.4 kg*m/s.

Remember the conservation of momentum, thus, the final momentum must be equal to the above one.

In the final situation, Yvonne and the bouquet move together with a speed of 10.01 m/s,

Then the final momentum is:

P' = (63kg + M)*(10.01 m/s)

And that must be equal to the initial momentum, then we have the equation:

(63kg + M)*(10.01 m/s) = 680.4 kg*m/s.

630.63kg*m/s + M*10.01 m/s = 680.4 kg*m/s.

M*10.01 m/s = 680.4 kg*m/s - 630.63kg*m/s = 49.77 kg*m/s

M = (49.77 kg*m/s)/(10.01 m/s) = 4.97 kg

So the mass of the bouquet is 4.97 kg

If you want to learn more about momentum, you can read:

brainly.com/question/19636349

3 0

2 years ago