It would 3 because if you read it tells you the answer
"Endothermic" is the way among the following choices given that you would <span>classify the following chemical reaction, in terms of energy. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>
Explanation:
Let us take the volume of block is x.
Since, the block is floating this means that it is in equilibrium. Formula to calculate net force will be as follows.

Also, buoyancy force
= (volume submerged in water × density of water) + (volume in oil × density of oil)
=
=
g
As, W = V × density of graphite × g
It is given that density of graphite is
or 2160
.
So, W = 2160 V g
= (0.592 V \rho + 408 V) g - 2160 V g = 0
= 1752
= 2959.46
or 2.959
is the density of oil.
It is given that mass of flask is 124.8 g.
Mass of 35.3
oil =
104.7 g
Hence, in second weighing total mass will be calculated as follows.
(124.8 + 104.7) g
= 229.27 g
Thus, we can conclude that in the second weighing mass is 229.27 g.
Answer:
91.16% has decayed & 8.84% remains
Explanation:
A = A₀e⁻ᵏᵗ => ln(A/A₀) = ln(e⁻ᵏᵗ) => lnA - lnA₀ = -kt => lnA = lnA₀ - kt
Rate Constant (k) = 0.693/half-life = 0.693/10³yrs = 6.93 x 10ˉ⁴yrsˉ¹
Time (t) = 1000yrs
A = fraction of nuclide remaining after 1000yrs
A₀ = original amount of nuclide = 1.00 (= 100%)
lnA = lnA₀ - kt
lnA = ln(1) – (6.93 x 10ˉ⁴yrsˉ¹)(3500yrs) = -2.426
A = eˉ²∙⁴²⁶ = 0.0884 = fraction of nuclide remaining after 3500 years
Amount of nuclide decayed = 1 – 0.0884 = 0.9116 or 91.16% has decayed.
This is a straightforward dilution calculation that can be done using the equation
where <em>M</em>₁ and <em>M</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) molar concentrations of the solution, respectively, and <em>V</em>₁ and <em>V</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) volumes of the solution, respectively.
Here, we have the initial concentration (<em>M</em>₁) and the initial (<em>V</em>₁) and final (<em>V</em>₂) volumes, and we want to find the final concentration (<em>M</em>₂), or the concentration of the solution after dilution. So, we can rearrange our equation to solve for <em>M</em>₂:

Substituting in our values, we get
![\[M_2=\frac{\left ( 50 \text{ mL} \right )\left ( 0.235 \text{ M} \right )}{\left ( 200.0 \text{ mL} \right )}= 0.05875 \text{ M}\].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5BM_2%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cleft%20%28%2050%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5Cleft%20%28%200.235%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20200.0%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%3D%200.05875%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%5C%5D.)
So the concentration of the diluted solution is 0.05875 M. You can round that value if necessary according to the appropriate number of sig figs. Note that we don't have to convert our volumes from mL to L since their conversion factors would cancel out anyway; what's important is the ratio of the volumes, which would be the same whether they're presented in milliliters or liters.