At steady state, air at 200 kPa, 325 K, and mass flow rate

ohaa [14]

The energy in which wind is used to generate electricity is known as wind energy. Wind turbines convert the kinetic energy in the wind into mechanical power. This mechanical power is then used for various purposes. Wind energy is a free and renewable resource. It is a clean and non-polluting source of energy.

3 0

3 years ago

This graph shows the US unemployment rate from<br> August 2010 to November 2011

MrRissso [65]

The graph could help an economist predict that how many people will be out of work in the next year. The correct option is c.

<h3>What is unemployment?</h3>

Unemployment is the condition where people who have knowledge or eligible for doing job, but they are not getting job. Unemployment is the scarcity of jobs.

The options are attached:

a. how the government will address unemployment.

b. why workers might have a harder time finding jobs.

c. how many people will be out of work in the next year.

d. why producers might hire fewer workers in the future.

Thus, the correct option is c. how many people will be out of work in the next year.

Learn more about unemployment

brainly.com/question/14227610

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

The rate of flow through an ideal clarifier is 8000m3 /d, the detention time is 1h and the depth is 3m. If a full-length movable

Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

a) 35%

b) yes it can be improved by moving the tray near the top

Tray should be located ( 1 to 2 meters below surface )

max removal efficiency ≈ 70%

c) The maximum removal will drop as the particle settling velocity = 0.5 m/h

Explanation:

Given data:

flow rate = 8000 m^3/d

Detention time = 1h

depth = 3m

Full length movable horizontal tray : 1m below surface

<u>a) Determine percent removal of particles having a settling velocity of 1m/h</u>

velocity of critical sized particle to be removed = Depth / Detention time

= 3 / 1 = 3m/h

The percent removal of particles having a settling velocity of 1m/h ≈ 35%

<u>b) Determine if the removal efficiency of the clarifier can be improved by moving the tray, the location of the tray and the maximum removal efficiency</u>

The tray should be located near the top of the tray ( i.e. 1 to 2 meters below surface ) because here the removal efficiency above the tray will be 100% but since the tank is quite small hence the

Total Maximum removal efficiency

= percent removal $_{above}$ + percent removal $_{below}$

= ( d $_{a}$ ,v $_{p}$ ) . $\frac{d_{a} }{depth}$ + ( d $_{a}$ ,v $_{p}$ ) . $\frac{depth - d_{a} }{depth}$ = 100

hence max removal efficiency ≈ 70%

<u>c) what is the effect of moving the tray would be if the particle settling velocity were equal to 0.5m/h?</u>

The maximum removal will drop as the particle settling velocity = 0.5 m/h

7 0

3 years ago

Need help fast 50 points Project: Creating a Morphological Matrix

Leokris [45]

Answer:

The fundamental difference between effective and less effective matrix organizations is whether the tension between different perspectives is creative or destructive. While various processes, systems and tools can help, what matters most is what top leadership says and does and how that flows through the organization in shared targets, clear accountabilities, live team interactions and team-building transparency and behaviors.

Getting matrix management right is linked inextricably to an organization’s culture - the only sustainable competitive advantage. Key components of a culture can be grouped into behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values and the environment.

Environment and values: Each organization has its own environment, context and bedrock values. Everyone needs to know what matters and why. Don’t try to do anything else until you’ve got that set.

Attitude is about choices: An organization’s overall strategy drives choices about which of its parts will be best in class (superior), world class (parity), strong (above average), or simplified/outsourced to be good enough. These choices help determine the need for a matrix and how best to design it.

Relationships and behaviors: This is why organizations have matrices. The most effective of them best balance focus and collaboration. They allow leaders and teams to build differential strengths and then work together to make the best possible decisions and scale enterprises with a creative tension that they could not do on their own.

My colleague Joe Durrett has worked all sides of matrix organizations in marketing at Procter & Gamble, sales and general management at Kraft General Foods and CEO of Information Resources, Broderbund Software and Advo. He has seen matrices at their best and at their worst and offered his perspective for this article along with his partners John Lawler and Linda Hlavac. The 12 ways to make matrix organizations more effective were built on their ideas.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

If a construction company is considering a new type of material to use in their construction, which factors would they

Amanda [17]

I would honestly select every one of the given options. Gor a company evaluating this new material it would be very valuable to hit each of these factors.

4 0

3 years ago