All categories

3 years ago

What was the purpose of the vasa ship

1 answer:

8 0

The main purpose was for power. The vessel has come to symbolize Sweden's Great Power Period, when the nation became a major European power and controlled much of the Baltic.

You might be interested in

Ages have been identified by the materials developed and used in those eras.

Westkost [7]

Ok what is the question

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

After testing a model of a fuel-efficient vehicle, scientists build a full-sized vehicle with improved fuel efficiency. Which st

Mazyrski [523]

B evaluate the solution. Sorry if I'm wrong.

4 0

3 years ago

AVH

BigorU [14]

Answer: preventive maintenance

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

A gas tank is known to have a thickness of 0.5 inches and an internal pressure of 2.2 ksi. Assuming that the maximum allowable s

sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

$D_o=11.9inch$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Thickness $T=0.5$

Internal Pressure $P=2.2Ksi$

Shear stress $\sigma=12ksi$

Elastic modulus $\gamma= 35000$

Generally the equation for shear stress is mathematically given by

$\sigma=\frac{P*r_1}{2*t}$

Where

r_i=internal Radius

Therefore

$12=\frac{2.2*r_1}{2*0.5}$

$r_i=5.45$

Generally

$r_o=r_1+t$

$r_o=5.45+0.5$

$r_o=5.95$

Generally the equation for outer diameter is mathematically given by

$D_o=2r_o$

$D_o=11.9inch$

Therefore

Assuming that the thin cylinder is subjected to integral Pressure

Outer Diameter is

$D_o=11.9inch$

7 0

3 years ago

Two different fuels are being considered for a 2.5 MW (net output) heat engine which can operate between the highest temperature

sveta [45]

Answer:

If the heat engine operates for one hour:

a) the fuel cost at Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $409.09 while fuel 2 is $421.88.

b) the fuel cost at 40% of Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $1022.73 while fuel 2 is $1054.68.

In both cases the total cost of using fuel 1 is minor, therefore it is recommended to use this fuel over fuel 2. The final observation is that fuel 1 is cheaper.

Explanation:

The Carnot efficiency is obtained as:

$\epsilon_{car}=1-\frac{T_c}{T_H}$

Where $T_c$ is the atmospheric temperature and $T_H$ is the maximum burn temperature.

For the case (B), the efficiency we will use is:

$\epsilon_{b}=0.4\epsilon_{car}$

The work done by the engine can be calculated as:

$W=\epsilon Q=\epsilon H_v\cdot m_{fuel}$ where Hv is the heat value.

If the average net power of the engine is work over time, considering a net power of 2.5MW for 1 hour (3600s), we can calculate the mass of fuel used in each case.

$m=\frac{P\cdot t}{\epsilon H_v}$

If we want to calculate the total fuel cost, we only have to multiply the fuel mass with the cost per kilogram.

$TC=m\cdot c$

8 0

2 years ago