Answer:
The resultant force would (still) be zero.
Explanation:
Before the 600-N force is removed, the crate is not moving (relative to the surface.) Its velocity would be zero. Since its velocity isn't changing, its acceleration would also be zero.
In effect, the 600-N force to the left and 200-N force to the right combines and acts like a 400-N force to the left.
By Newton's Second Law, the resultant force on the crate would be zero. As a result, friction (the only other horizontal force on the crate) should balance that 400-N force. In this case, the friction should act in the opposite direction with a size of 400 N.
When the 600-N force is removed, there would only be two horizontal forces on the crate: the 200-N force to the right, and friction. The maximum friction possible must be at least 200 N such that the resultant force would still be zero. In this case, the static friction coefficient isn't known. As a result, it won't be possible to find the exact value of the maximum friction on the crate.
However, recall that before the 600-N force is removed, the friction on the crate is 400 N. The normal force on the crate (which is in the vertical direction) did not change. As a result, one can hence be assured that the maximum friction would be at least 400 N. That's sufficient for balancing the 200-N force to the right. Hence, the resultant force on the crate would still be zero, and the crate won't move.
Answer:
which corresponds to the second option shown: "voltage times amperage"
Explanation:
The electric power is the work done to move a charge Q across a given difference of potential V per unit of time.
Since such electrical work is the product of the potential difference V times the charge that moves through that potential, and this work is to be calculated by the unit of time, we need to divide the product by time (t) which leads to the following final simple equation:

Notice that we replaced the quotient representing charge per unit of time (Q/t) by the actual current running through the circuit.
This corresponds to the second option shown in the question: "Voltage times amperage".
The ratio of the turns to the voltage should be equal
i.e: 200/120 = t/12
so the secondary coil should have 20 turns
The answer to the given statement above would be FALSE. It is not true that chemicals in clouds can cause rainstorms to occur. Rather, rainstorms happen when cumulonimbus clouds are formed. Rainstorms include <span>moisture, unstable air and lift. Hope this answers your question.</span>