The answer is particels of nuclis
You can predict it based of the electronegativity
<h3>Answer:</h3>
There is One electrophilic center in acetyl chloride.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
Electrophile is defined as any specie which is electron deficient and is in need of electrons to complete its electron density or octet. The main two types of electrophiles are those species which either contain positive charge (i.e. NO₂⁺, Cl⁺, Br⁺ e.t.c) or partial positive charge like that contained by the sp² hybridized carbon of acetyl chloride shown below in attached picture.
In acetyl chloride the partial positive charge on sp² hybridized carbon is generated due to its direct bonding to highly electronegative elements *with partial negative charge) like oxygen and chlorine, which tend to pull the electron density from carbon atom making it electron deficient and a good electrophile for incoming nucleophile as a center of attack.
The wavelength of the orange line is 610 nm, the frequency of this emission is 4.92 x 10¹⁴ Hz and the energy of the emitted photon corresponding to this <em>orange line</em> is 3.26 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.
<em>"Your question is not complete, it seems to be missing the diagram of the emission spectrum"</em>
the diagram of the emission spectrum has been added.
<em>From the given</em><em> chart;</em>
The wavelength of the atomic emission corresponding to the orange line is 610 nm = 610 x 10⁻⁹ m
The frequency of this emission is calculated as follows;
c = fλ
where;
- <em>c is the speed of light = 3 x 10⁸ m/s</em>
- <em>f is the frequency of the wave</em>
- <em>λ is the wavelength</em>

The energy of the emitted photon corresponding to the orange line is calculated as follows;
E = hf
where;
- <em>h is Planck's constant = 6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ Js</em>
<em />
E = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴) x (4.92 x 10¹⁴)
E = 3.26 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Thus, the wavelength of the orange line is 610 nm, the frequency of this emission is 4.92 x 10¹⁴ Hz and the energy of the emitted photon corresponding to this <em>orange line</em> is 3.26 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Learn more here:brainly.com/question/15962928
No He believed tiny particles were invisible and couldn't be changed....So No The person that believed in this was Dalton .