1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Novay_Z [31]
3 years ago
8

You start with an equimolar mixture of the gases SO₂ and O₂ in a container. The SO₂ and O₂ react to completion to form SO₃. If t

he temperature after the reaction is 25°C and the pressure in the container is 1.65 atm, what is the density of the product gas mixture? Assume ideal behavior.
Chemistry
1 answer:
LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago
8 0

The density of the product gas mixture is 5.39 g/L

Explanation:

<u>Given:</u>

Temperature after the reaction = 25^0C

Pressure in the container = 1.65 atm

The ideal gas equation PV = nRT

<u>To find:</u> Density of the product gas mixture

<u>Step 1:</u>

Molarity (M) = P/(RT)

\[M=\frac{P}{R T}\]$M=\frac{1.65 \mathrm{atm}}{\left(0.08206 \frac{L \cdot a t m}{m o l . K}\right)(298.15 K)}$

M = 0.0674 mol/L

<u>Step 2: </u>

The product of the given reaction is SO_3. Its molar mass is

1S x 32.066 g/mol = 32.066 g/mol

3O x 16 g/mol = 48 g/mol

Adding both we get 80.066 g/mol

Therefore the density of the product gas mixture is 0.0674 \frac{{mol}}{L} \times \frac{80.066 g}{1 \mathrm{mol}}

= 5.39 g/L

You might be interested in
1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^6 how many unpaired electrons are in the atom represented by the electron configuration above?
Sedbober [7]
It's a combination of factors:
Less electrons paired in the same orbital
More electrons with parallel spins in separate orbitals
Pertinent valence orbitals NOT close enough in energy for electron pairing to be stabilized enough by large orbital size
DISCLAIMER: Long answer, but it's a complicated issue, so... :)
A lot of people want to say that it's because a "half-filled subshell" increases stability, which is a reason, but not necessarily the only reason. However, for chromium, it's the significant reason.
It's also worth mentioning that these reasons are after-the-fact; chromium doesn't know the reasons we come up with; the reasons just have to be, well, reasonable.
The reasons I can think of are:
Minimization of coulombic repulsion energy
Maximization of exchange energy
Lack of significant reduction of pairing energy overall in comparison to an atom with larger occupied orbitals
COULOMBIC REPULSION ENERGY
Coulombic repulsion energy is the increased energy due to opposite-spin electron pairing, in a context where there are only two electrons of nearly-degenerate energies.
So, for example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is higher in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier on us, we can crudely "measure" the repulsion energy with the symbol
Π
c
. We'd just say that for every electron pair in the same orbital, it adds one
Π
c
unit of destabilization.
When you have something like this with parallel electron spins...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
It becomes important to incorporate the exchange energy.
EXCHANGE ENERGY
Exchange energy is the reduction in energy due to the number of parallel-spin electron pairs in different orbitals.
It's a quantum mechanical argument where the parallel-spin electrons can exchange with each other due to their indistinguishability (you can't tell for sure if it's electron 1 that's in orbital 1, or electron 2 that's in orbital 1, etc), reducing the energy of the configuration.
For example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is lower in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier for us, a crude way to "measure" exchange energy is to say that it's equal to
Π
e
for each pair that can exchange.
So for the first configuration above, it would be stabilized by
Π
e
(
1
↔
2
), but the second configuration would have a
0
Π
e
stabilization (opposite spins; can't exchange).
PAIRING ENERGY
Pairing energy is just the combination of both the repulsion and exchange energy. We call it
Π
, so:
Π
=
Π
c
+
Π
e

Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Basically, the pairing energy is:
higher when repulsion energy is high (i.e. many electrons paired), meaning pairing is unfavorable
lower when exchange energy is high (i.e. many electrons parallel and unpaired), meaning pairing is favorable
So, when it comes to putting it together for chromium... (
4
s
and
3
d
orbitals)
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
compared to
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
is more stable.
For simplicity, if we assume the
4
s
and
3
d
electrons aren't close enough in energy to be considered "nearly-degenerate":
The first configuration has
Π
=
10
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
1
↔
5
,
2
↔
3
,

2
↔
4
,
2
↔
5
,
3
↔
4
,
3
↔
5
,
4
↔
5
)
The second configuration has
Π
=
Π
c
+
6
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
2
↔
3
,
2
↔
4
,
3
↔
4
)
Technically, they are about
3.29 eV
apart (Appendix B.9), which means it takes about
3.29 V
to transfer a single electron from the
3
d
up to the
4
s
.
We could also say that since the
3
d
orbitals are lower in energy, transferring one electron to a lower-energy orbital is helpful anyways from a less quantitative perspective.
COMPLICATIONS DUE TO ORBITAL SIZE
Note that for example,
W
has a configuration of
[
X
e
]
5
d
4
6
s
2
, which seems to contradict the reasoning we had for
Cr
, since the pairing occurred in the higher-energy orbital.
But, we should also recognize that
5
d
orbitals are larger than
3
d
orbitals, which means the electron density can be more spread out for
W
than for
Cr
, thus reducing the pairing energy
Π
.
That is,
Π
W
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do acids feel like
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

In fact, some strong bases can burn the skin as badly as strong acids. Bases feel soapy or slippery because they react with acidic molecules in your skin called fatty acids. ... Like acids, bases change the colors of acid-base indicators, but the colors they produce are different. Bases turn litmus paper blue.

3 0
4 years ago
If a combination reaction takes place between potassium and chlorine what is the product
zepelin [54]
It would be potassium chloride or kcl
4 0
4 years ago
Can a pressure change shift the equilibrium position in every reversible reaction? Explain
Juliette [100K]
Jakdiiucuwjabbzahqhahs
4 0
4 years ago
When 125 mL of 0.150 M Pb(NO3)2 is mixed with 145 mL of 0.200 M KBr, 4.92 g of PbBr2 is collected. Calculate the percent yield.
Semenov [28]

Answer:

Y = 92.5 %

Explanation:

Hello there!

In this case, since the reaction between lead (II) nitrate and potassium bromide is:

Pb(NO_3)_2+2KBr\rightarrow PbBr_2+2KNO_3

Exhibits a 1:2 mole ratio of the former to the later, we can calculate the moles of lead (II) bromide product to figure out the limiting reactant:

0.125L*0.150\frac{molPb(NO_3)_2}{L} *\frac{1molPbBr_2}{1molPb(NO_3)_2} =0.01875molPbBr_2\\\\0.145L*0.200\frac{molKBr}{L} *\frac{1molPbBr_2}{2molKBr} =0.0145molPbBr_2

Thus, the limiting reactant is the KBr as it yields the fewest moles of PbBr2 product. Afterwards, we calculate the mass of product by using its molar mass:

0.0145molPbBr_2*\frac{367.01gPbBr_2}{1molPbBr_2} =5.32gPbBr_2

And the resulting percent yield:

Y=\frac{4.92g}{5.32g} *100\%\\\\Y=92.5\%

Regards!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Will give brainliest good points too help asap
    5·1 answer
  • What's the mass of methanol?
    6·2 answers
  • Whenever energy is ______ from one form to another, some of that energy is lost by being changed into heat.
    8·1 answer
  • Estimate the surface-to-volume ratio of a C60 fullerene by treating the molecule as a hollow sphere and using 77pm for the atomi
    9·1 answer
  • Why are atoms of lithium, sodium, and potassium almost never found alone in nature??
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the atomic number of an alkali metal? <br> 10<br> 11<br> 12<br> 13
    12·2 answers
  • Which property of sodium is not typical of a metal
    13·1 answer
  • List out the effects seen inplants due to lack of phosphorus.​
    6·1 answer
  • An automobile tire at 30°C has a pressure of 3.00 atm. Temperature decreases to -5°C. Assume that there is no volume change in t
    11·1 answer
  • 6) The following questions refer to F2 and Cl2.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!