Answer:
1. <u>F = ma</u> <em>F = 0.2kg * 20m/s² = 4Kg * m/s² =</em> 4N
2. <u>F = ma</u> <em>F - 18Kg * 3m/s² = 54Kg * m/s² =</em> 54N
3. <u>F = ma</u> <em>F = 0.025Kg * 5m/s² =</em> 0.125N
4. <u>F = ma</u> <em>F = 50Kg * 4m/s² =</em> 200N
5. <u>F = ma</u> <em>F = 70Kg * 4m/s² =</em> 280N
6. <u>F = ma</u> <em>F = 9Kg * 9.8m/s² =</em> 88.2N
Explanation:
Hope this helps ! ^^
Answer:
CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning should be minimized at all cost. The CO2 are gotten when the carbons from hydrocarbons react with air(oxygen). This gas erodes the ozone layer which makes the melting of ice caps faster due to increased amount of heat radiations on the earth. This is the only best and permanent solution to the reduction of the amount of heat rays on the earth which is a global problem.
Objects which reflects back the sunrays could also be inserted into the sea to prevent the melting of the ice caps.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Just because the book is moving doesn't tell you anything about the forces on it, or even whether there ARE any.
Just look at Newton's first law of motion, and this time, let's try and THINK about it too. It says something to the effect that any object continues in constant, uniform MOTION ..... UNLESS acted on by an external force.
Acceleration due to gravity.
