<em>The correct answer is option</em><em> B.</em> The maximum height that can be reached by the stone is determined as 11.5 m.
<h3>
Maximum height attained by the stone </h3>
The maximum height attained by the stone when it is a 2/3 of its total height is calculated as follows;
v² = u² - 2gh
where;
- v is final velocity at maximum height, v = 0
- u is initial velocity
- g is acceleration due to gravity
0 = u² - 2gh
2gh = u²
h = u²/2g
h = (15²)/(2 x 9.8)
h = 11.48 m
h = 11.5 m
Thus, the maximum height that can be reached by the stone is determined as 11.5 m
Learn more about maximum height here: brainly.com/question/12446886
#SPJ1
This question requires the use of the equation of motion:
v = u + at [v is final velocity (0), u is initial velocity (24), a is acceleration, t is time (13)]
to calculate the acceleration. This can then be multiplied by the mass of the plane to obtain the net force via:
F = ma (F is force, m is mass, a is acceleration)
First, we calculate the acceleration:
0 = 24 + 13(a)
a = -24/13 m/s^2
The force is then:
F = 90000 * (-24/13)
F = -1.66*10^5 Newtons
The negative sign indicates that the force and acceleration are in the opposite direction as the velocity (since we took velocity to be positive)
How might a suit of armor be a good analogy for a function of the skeletal system?
It's a frame for your body and protects organs and armor protects your body from injury
Answer:
proof in explanation
Explanation:
First, we will calculate the number of half-lives:
where,
n = no. of half-lives = ?
t = total time passed = 2100 million years
= half-life = 700 million years
Therefore,
Now, we will calculate the number of uranium nuclei left (
):
and the rest of the uranium nuclei will become thorium nuclei (
)
dividing both:
<u>Hence, it is proven that after 2100 million years there are seven times more thorium nuclei than uranium nuclei in the rock.</u>
Answer:
Explanation:
When the number of slits increases, the intensity of fringes increases.
So, the fringes appear to be more bright.
As we know that the fringe width is inversely proportional to the number of slits, so as the number of slits increases, the fringe width decreases, hence the fringes are narrower, bright and close together.
