Answer:
Perm lasts longer
Explanation:
Cuz a chemical relaxer only lasts a few weeks and a perm lasts a few months hope this helps
Answer:
The angle of incidence is greater than the angle of refraction
Explanation:
Refraction occurs when a light wave passes through the boundary between two mediums.
When a ray of light is refracted, it changes speed and direction, according to Snell's Law:
where
:
is the index of refraction of the 1st medium
is the index of refraction of the 2nd medium
is the angle of incidence (the angle between the incident ray and the normal to the boundary)
is the angle of refraction (the angle between the refracted ray and the normal to the boundary)
In this problem, we have a ray of light passing from air into clear plastic. We have:
(index of refraction of air)
approx. (index of refraction in clear plastic)
Snell's Law can be rewritten as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83cc3/83cc32c943aace0769e506547785cd96d6e6fecd" alt="sin \theta_2 =\frac{n_1}{n_2}sin \theta_1"
And since
, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e6f1/0e6f14182d55c1340cfc8fd075a2a70c8633f211" alt="\frac{n_1}{n_2}"
And so
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d82af/d82afdb9f735f3926a0ec2cda54b2ac8f0630d98" alt="\theta_2"
Which means that
The angle of incidence is greater than the angle of refraction
Newton's second law states that the resultant of the forces applied to an object is equal to the product between the object's mass and its acceleration:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88e97/88e97238e9df4afcd14331d1b26971cbba8ff505" alt="\sum F = ma"
where in our problem, m is the mass the (child+cart) and a is the acceleration of the system.
We are only concerned about what it happens on the horizontal axis, so there are two forces acting on the cart+child system: the force F of the man pushing it, and the frictional force
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10dcb/10dcb8144f5ecf061f8ad0fa28f11eea286f7f0a" alt="F_f"
acting in the opposite direction. So Newton's second law can be rewritten as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/259ca/259cacdf628d2b86aed30432d921e6c9cf721fdc" alt="F-F_a = ma"
or
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e3c7/2e3c7d80e10e5bc6ed283560aaa4d1e7a355dfa0" alt="F=ma + F_f"
since the frictional force is 15 N and we want to achieve an acceleration of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/286db/286dbacbf871c2ae823c08a2eff16c818394386b" alt="a=1.50 m/s^2"
, we can substitute these values to find what is the force the man needs:
Answer:
The velocity will be v = 22.1[m/s]
Explanation:
We can solve this problem by using the principle of energy conservation, where potential energy is converted to kinetic energy. For this problem we will take the point with maximum potential energy when the body is 25 [m] high. By the time the height is zero, the potential energy will have been transformed into kinetic energy, and we can find the velocity of the body.
![Ep = m*g*h\\where:\\m = mass = 88.2[kg]\\h = elevation = 25[m]\\g = gravity = 9.81 [m/s^2]\\Ep = 88.2*25*9.81 = 21631.05[J]\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ep%20%3D%20m%2Ag%2Ah%5C%5Cwhere%3A%5C%5Cm%20%3D%20mass%20%3D%2088.2%5Bkg%5D%5C%5Ch%20%3D%20elevation%20%3D%2025%5Bm%5D%5C%5Cg%20%3D%20gravity%20%3D%209.81%20%5Bm%2Fs%5E2%5D%5C%5CEp%20%3D%2088.2%2A25%2A9.81%20%3D%2021631.05%5BJ%5D%5C%5C)
Now we know that the energy will be transformed.
![Ek=Ep\\Ek=0.5*m*v^{2} \\where:\\v=velocity [m/s]\\v=\sqrt{\frac{Ek}{0.5*m} } \\v=\sqrt{\frac{21631.05}{0.5*88.2} } \\v=22.14[m/s]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ek%3DEp%5C%5CEk%3D0.5%2Am%2Av%5E%7B2%7D%20%5C%5Cwhere%3A%5C%5Cv%3Dvelocity%20%5Bm%2Fs%5D%5C%5Cv%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7BEk%7D%7B0.5%2Am%7D%20%7D%20%5C%5Cv%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B21631.05%7D%7B0.5%2A88.2%7D%20%7D%20%5C%5Cv%3D22.14%5Bm%2Fs%5D)
Answer:
I'd probably drop it on my toes. That would happen.
Explanation: