Answer:
the endangered spices act
Explanation: The US Endangered Species Act (ESA) is our nation's most effective law to protect at-risk species from extinction, with a stellar success rate: 99% of species listed on it have avoided extinction.
B I hope it’s right I don’t really help a lot but yeah lol
Answer: Microscope
Explanation: This is a kid answering :)
Answer:
C8H8 + 10O2 → 8CO2 + 4H2O
Explanation:
unbalanced reaction:
C8H8 + O2 → CO2 + H2O
balanced for semireactions:
(1) 16H2O + C8H8 → 8CO2 + 40H+
(2) 10(4H+ + O2 → 2H2O)
⇒ 40H+ + 10O2 → 20H2O
(1) + (2):
balanced reaction:
⇒ C8H8 + 10O2 → 8CO2 + 4H2O
8 - C - 8
20 - O2 - 20
8 - H - 8
Answer:
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating
Explanation:
a) Strong initial heating caused some of the hydrate sample to splatter out.
This will result in a higher percent of water than the real one, because you assume in the calculation that the splattered sample was only water (which in not true).
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating.
Usually inorganic salts may absorbed moisture from the atmosphere so this will explain the 13% difference between calculated water percent the real content of water in the hydrate.
c) The amount of the hydrate sample used was too small.
It will create some errors but they do not create a difference of 13% difference as stated in the problem.
d) The crucible was not heated to constant mass before use.
Here the error is small.
e) Excess heating caused the dehydrated sample to decompose.
Usually the inorganic compounds are stable in the temperature range of this kind of experiments. If you have an organic compound which retain water molecules you may decompose the sample forming volatile compounds which will leave crucible so the error will be quite high.
