1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
8

A long, thin rod parallel to the y-axis is located at x = - 1 cm and carries a uniform positive charge density λ = 1 nC/m . A se

cond long, thin rod parallel to the z-axis is located at x = +1 cm and carries a uniform negative charge density λ = - 1 nC/m. What is the electric field at the origin?
Physics
1 answer:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The electric field at origin is 3600 N/C

Solution:

As per the question:

Charge density of rod 1, \lambda = 1\ nC = 1\times 10^{- 9}\ C

Charge density of rod 2, \lambda = - 1\ nC = - 1\times 10^{- 9}\ C

Now,

To calculate the electric field at origin:

We know that the electric field due to a long rod is given by:

\vec{E} = \frac{\lambda }{2\pi \epsilon_{o}{R}

Also,

\vec{E} = \frac{2K\lambda }{R}                  (1)

where

K = electrostatic constant = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_{o} R}

R = Distance

\lambda = linear charge density

Now,

In case, the charge is positive, the electric field is away from the rod and towards it if the charge is negative.

At x = - 1 cm = - 0.01 m:

Using eqn (1):

\vec{E} = \frac{2\times 9\times 10^{9}\times 1\times 10^{- 9}}{0.01} = 1800\ N/C

\vec{E} = 1800\ N/C     (towards)

Now, at x = 1 cm = 0.01 m :

Using eqn (1):

\vec{E'} = \frac{2\times 9\times 10^{9}\times - 1\times 10^{- 9}}{0.01} = - 1800\ N/C

\vec{E'} = 1800\ N/C     (towards)

Now, the total field at the origin is the sum of both the fields:

\vec{E_{net}} = 1800 + 1800 = 3600\ N/C

You might be interested in
Consider two waves defined by the wave functions y1(x,t)=0.50msin(2π3.00mx+2π4.00st) and y2(x,t)=0.50msin(2π6.00mx−2π4.00st). Wh
guapka [62]

Answer:

They two waves has the same amplitude and frequency but different wavelengths.

Explanation: comparing the wave equation above with the general wave equation

y(x,t) = Asin(2Πft + 2Πx/¶)

Let ¶ be the wavelength

A is the amplitude

f is the frequency

t is the time

They two waves has the same amplitude and frequency but different wavelengths.

4 0
3 years ago
How many electrons can exist on the following energy levels
alukav5142 [94]
2e level 1
8e level 2
18e level 3
32e level 4
6 0
2 years ago
4. A 1200 kg car traveling North at 20.0 m/s collides with a 1400 kg car traveling South at 22.0 m/s. The two
Dvinal [7]

Answer:-2.61 m/s

Explanation:

This problem can be solved by the Conservation of Momentum principle, which establishes that the initial momentum p_{o} must be equal to the final momentum p_{f}:

p_{o}=p_{f} (1)

Where:

p_{o}=mV_{o}+MU_{o} (2)

p_{f}=(m+M)V_{f} (3)

m=1200 kg is the mass of the first car

V_{o}=20 m/s is the velocity of the first car, to the North

M=1400 kg is the mass of the second car

U_{o}=-22 m/s is the mass of the second car, to the South

V_{f} is the final velocity of both cars after the collision

mV_{o}+MU_{o}=(m+M)V_{f} (4)

Isolating V_{f}:

V_{f}=\frac{mV_{o}+MU_{o}}{m+M} (5)

V_{f}=\frac{(1200 kg)(20 m/s)+(1400 kg)(-22 m/s)}{1200 kg+1400 kg} (6)

Finally:

V_{f}=-2.61 m/s (7) This is the resulting velocity of the wreckage, to the south

7 0
3 years ago
Since vectors always have positive magnitudes, the sum of two vectors must have a magnitude greater than the magnitude of either
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Yes the magnitude of a vector is always positive , but a vector consists of

  • magnitude
  • direction

when two vectors are added their direction may be opposite to each other For example-

a=3i+3j

b=3i-6j ,

then their resultant

r=b+a\\r=3i+3j+3i-6j\\r=6i-3j

This resultant vector's x and y component equal to y and x component of vector b so its magnitude will be equal to magnitude of vector b.

Therefore, the resultant magnitude not necessary equal to the magnitude of either vector.

6 0
3 years ago
Why are objects that fall near earths surface rarely in free fall?
marissa [1.9K]

"Free fall" means that gravity is the ONLY force acting on the object.  If there's air resistance, then it isn't free-fall.  

Objects that fall near earths surface are ALWAYS falling through air, unless they're inside some kind of a vacuum chamber with all the air removed from it.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A football player at practice pushes a 60 kg blocking sled across the field at a constant speed. The coefficient of kinetic fric
    8·2 answers
  • A soccer ball is kicked with an initial horizontal velocity of 12 m/s and an initial vertical velocity of 19 m/s. 1 what is the
    10·1 answer
  • A capacitor is made from two hollow, coaxial, iron cylinders, one inside the other. The inner cylinder is negatively charged and
    10·1 answer
  • What is the kinetic energy of an object that has a mass of 50.0kg and a velocity of 18 m/s?
    6·1 answer
  • Which medium below conducts sound the fastest?
    11·2 answers
  • a 2 meter tall astronaut standing on mars drops her glasses from her nose. how long will the astronaut have before he hits the g
    13·1 answer
  • A car slows from 22m/s to 3.0m/a at a constant rate of 2.1m/s. How many seconds are required before the car is traveling at 3.0m
    12·1 answer
  • The height of a flagpole is 8.5 meters tall. If the length of the meter stick shadow is 1.5 meters long, what would be the lengt
    12·1 answer
  • D. 'g' vanishes at centre of
    9·1 answer
  • After soccer practice, Coach Miller goes to the roof of the school to retrieve the errant soccer balls. The height of the school
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!