The correct answer for the statement “All the scientific
theories used to explain the formation of the solar system are non-testable”. The
answers outdated, imaginative and unacceptable are wrong. These theories are
not proven and yet are not tested due to the complexity.
Answer:
289282
Explanation:
r = Radius of plate = 0.52 mm
d = Plate separation = 0.013 mm
A = Area = 
V = Potential applied = 2 mV
k = Dielectric constant = 40
= Electric constant = 
Capacitance is given by

Charge is given by

Number of electron is given by

The number of charge carriers that will accumulate on this capacitor is approximately 289282.
The speed and distances are directly proportional. Use ratios to solve for vertical y-distance. The ratio of x-distance west to y-distance north equals the x-velocity to y-velocity.
x/y = vx/vy
41/y = 8.6/5.2
41/y = 1.65
41/1.65 = y
24.8 m = y
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
For the first question you could devise a way to test the question to find the answer. You could create a sample of black cats, a sample of white cats, and a control sample of a both black and white cats.
<span>You would measure how much the cats eat each day. The study could be repeated or reviewed by your peers. </span>
<span>For the second question, there is currently no way to sample a person's thoughts, but even if there was a way, there would be no way to repeat the moment. It is not testable and not repeatable and thus cannot use the scientific method. </span>
<span>Calories can be measured and compared. </span>
<span>The tide can be observed until someone hypothesizes the right testable notion to determine the answer.</span>