Because the object is still made of the same material
Density is not affected by the weight and shape of an object its affected by how concentrated the atoms are in a given volume
Answer:
Well, if you look up countries with the highest birth rates, also those countries poverty rates and what class the majority of the people are in then you should have a better understanding. Also, education is not passed through genes it is learned through expirience and being taught. Also being rich vs being poor probably doesn't have that big of an effect either. It is the living conditions.
Explanation:
Well first of all, when it comes to orbits of the planets around
the sun, there's no such thing as "orbital paths", in the sense
of definite ("quantized") distances that the planets can occupy
but not in between. That's the case with the electrons in an atom,
but a planet's orbit can be any old distance from the sun at all.
If Mercury, or any planet, were somehow moved to an orbit closer
to the sun, then ...
-- its speed in orbit would be greater,
-- the distance around its orbit would be shorter,
-- its orbital period ("year") would be shorter,
-- the temperature everywhere on its surface would be higher,
-- if it has an atmosphere now, then its atmosphere would become
less dense, and might soon disappear entirely,
-- the intensity of x-rays, charged particles, and other forms of
solar radiation arriving at its surface would be greater.
Answer:
0.667 grams per cm cubed
Explanation:
the formula for density is mass divided by volume
Refer to the attached figure. Xp may not be between the particles but the reasoning is the same nonetheless.
At xp the electric field is the sum of both electric fields, remember that at a coordinate x for a particle placed at x' we have the electric field of a point charge (all of this on the x-axis of course):

Now At xp we have:


Which is a second order equation, using the quadratic formula to solve for xp would give us:

or

Plug the relevant values to get both answers.
Now, let's comment on which of those answers is the right answer. It happens that
BOTH are correct. This is simply explained by considring the following.
Let's place a possitive test charge on the system This charge feels a repulsive force due to q1 but an attractive force due to q2, if we place the charge somewhere to the left of q2 the attractive force of q2 will cancel the repulsive force of q1, this translates to a zero electric field at this x coordinate. The same could happen if we place the test charge at some point to the right of q1, hence we can have two possible locations in which the electric field is zero. The second image shows two possible locations for xp.