All categories

3 years ago

Dd is recessive or dominant

Chemistry

2 answers:

Kobotan [32]3 years ago

7 0

Dd is recessive i got it right

slava [35]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:This would be heterozygous, so both dominant and recessive alleles are written.

Explanation:Heterozygous means that the dominant and recessive alleles are written genotypically.

You might be interested in

Which of the following possess the greatest concentration of hydroxide ions?

jek_recluse [69]

Answer : The correct option is (d) a solution of 0.10 M NaOH

Explanation :

(a) a solution of pH 3.0

First we have to calculate the pOH.

$pH+pOH=14\\\\pOH=14-pH\\\\pOH=14-3.0=11$

Now we have to calculate the $OH^-$ concentration.

$pOH=-\log [OH^-]$

$11=-\log [OH^-]$

$[OH^-]=1.0\times 10^{-11}M$

Thus, the $OH^-$ concentration is, $1.0\times 10^{-11}M$

(b) a solution of 0.10 M $NH_3$

As we know that 1 mole of $NH_3$ is a weak base. So, in a solution it will not dissociates completely.

So, the $OH^-$ concentration will be less than 0.10 M

(c) a solution with a pOH of 12.

We have to calculate the $OH^-$ concentration.

$pOH=-\log [OH^-]$

$12=-\log [OH^-]$

$[OH^-]=1.0\times 10^{-12}M$

Thus, the $OH^-$ concentration is, $1.0\times 10^{-12}M$

(d) a solution of 0.10 M NaOH

As we know that $NaOH$ is a strong base. So, it dissociates to give $Na^+$ ion and $OH^-$ ion.

So, 0.10 M of $NaOH$ in a solution dissociates to give 0.10 M of $Na^+$ ion and 0.10 M of $OH^-$ ion.

Thus, the $OH^-$ concentration is, 0.10 M

(e) a $1\times 10^{-4}M$ solution of $HNO_2$

As we know that 1 mole of $HNO_2$ in a solution dissociates to give 1 mole of $H^+$ ion and 1 mole of $NO_2^-$ ion.

So, $1\times 10^{-4}M$ of $HNO_2$ in a solution dissociates to give $1\times 10^{-4}M$ of $H^+$ ion and $1\times 10^{-4}M$ of $NO_2^-$ ion.

The concentration of $H^+$ ion is $1\times 10^{-4}M$

First we have to calculate the pH.

$pH=-\log [H^+]$

$pH=-\log (1.0\times 10^{-4})$

$pH=4$

Now we have to calculate the pOH.

$pH+pOH=14\\\\pOH=14-pH\\\\pOH=14-4=10$

Now we have to calculate the $OH^-$ concentration.

$pOH=-\log [OH^-]$

$10=-\log [OH^-]$

$[OH^-]=1.0\times 10^{-10}M$

Thus, the $OH^-$ concentration is, $1.0\times 10^{-10}M$

From this we conclude that, a solution of 0.10 M NaOH possess the greatest concentration of hydroxide ions.

Hence, the correct option is (d)

3 0

3 years ago

I will give you brainlest answer right please

lukranit [14]

Adrenaline gives you energy and stimulates your heart. When in stressful situations, like survival, you’re body is reacting and releasing this hormone.

8 0

3 years ago

Example of chemical change?

musickatia [10]

Answer:

Burning of paper and log of wood.

Digestion of food.

Boiling an egg.

Chemical battery usage.

Electroplating a metal.

Baking a cake.

Milk going sour.

Various metabolic reactions that take place in the cells.

hope this helps!

add me/ mark as brainiest if you can<3

3 0

3 years ago

Write the balanced equation of aluminium + copper chloride and ammonium chloride + copper

Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

2Al+3CuCl2=>3Cu + 2AlCl3

NH4Cl catalyses the oxidation of Cu

6 0

3 years ago

If you start with 13 mole H2O and 50 grams of O2 what is the percent yield of H202 if 100 grams of H202 is actually made?

dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

94.1 %

Explanation:

We firstly determine the equation:

2H₂O + O₂ → 2H₂O₂

2 moles of water react to 1 mol of oxygen in order to produce 2 moles of oxygen peroxide.

We convert the mass of oxygen to moles:50 g . 1mol /32g = 1.56 mol

Certainly oxygen is the limiting reactant.

2 moles of water react to 1 mol of oxygen.

13 moles of water may react to 13/2 = 6.5 moles. (And we only have 1.56)

As we determine the limiting reactant we continue to the products:

1 mol of O₂ can produce 2 moles of H₂O₂

Then 1.56 moles of O₂ will produce (1.56 . 2) = 3.125 moles

We convert the moles to mass: 3.125 mol . 34 g/mol= 106.25 g

That's the 100% yield or it can be called theoretical yield.

Percent yield = (Yield produced / Theoretical yield) . 100

(100g / 106.25 g) . 100 = 94.1 %

3 0

3 years ago