The speed of the runner is 300 m /38 seconds. You can simplify this answer to be about 7.9 m/s
Inertia is the resistance of an object to a change in its B. Motion
Equation: Mass x Velocity = Momentum
Answer: 93 x 13 = 1,209
Answer:
When broadcasting live on social, keep in mind that the best broadcasts are ones that feel like a conversation between brand and viewer. Unlike other forms of social video, you’ll get more views and engagement if your video
is longer and repeats key points.
Explanation:
When broadcasting live on social media, one should be live for long because in this way one can get more views as audience will increase with time. There should be an interaction with the audience like answering their questions which they write in the comments section. These comments and views will make this video to the top of news feed. Secondly the most important thing is the content of the video. One must focus on the information or knowledge he/she wants to convey and must repeat the key points again and again so that one who has missed the important points will be able catch them later.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
